I agree with Bruce pretty much. Of course I also have some agreement with Neil

but it really gets to a different direction to me. I say that none of the current authentication procedures of anyone can do anything more than give an "opinion" for most material because none of them can what is totally necessary for a correct & valuable authentication certificate to have meaning: that chemical analysis of the paper & inks must happen to really provide a meaningful authentication for most items. That's in addition to having such things as an image database of 100/200/300 times magnifications of both authentic for reference & known forgeries for a different reference. You're talking about multiple sample images of each posters from specific points, repetitively for many authentic examples as well as databases of all kinds of paper printed during the past 110 years, different ink analysis and on and on, much like a CSI lab has on tires, sneakers, gun riflings. That is a true lab run by people educated in such matters. You need to have a database of all reproductions, like S2, MovieGoods, the guys who do those full size top quality inserts so when one comes around, you know

Look, the lobby cards are easy to authenticate. if you can peel a contemporary sheet of paper from the back of a lobby card or a window card.. that's an obvious fake. But what if the forger was more sophisticated and used an original lithography press on vintage paper with hand mixed inks made from the same types of dyes etc that were used 50 or 100 years ago?? What if instead of gluing the top sheet to the lobby card back, if you used a lobby card back to print on (I can. I tried already) and a hi pressure press that does not need glue to merge the layers?

Also, once any of the forged one sheets were linenbacked, that is different than the lobby card forgeries and more difficult to determine

Take a look at Sean's response.. he didn't say he wouldn't buy any when he was offered because he thought they were fake - he said he thought they were "Frankencards" built from the dead corpses of other cards. This material fooled everyone on some level including many top experts

very simply.. I don't think anyone in the hobby is 100% qualified to truly authenticate 100% of the forgeries.. Period


At 04:19 PM 2/14/2010, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
Neil,

I was not directing my message at you, only the inevitable 'follow-up" love letters to John Davis that are sure to follow your post. The guy made a serious blunder, but he could do a lot of good for the hobby. I wish everyone would save their hostility for the truly bad guys out there, the ones who make fakes (expensive and inexpensive) and pass them off as real.

Bruce

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Neil Jaworski <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: hello bruce, i'm sorry you feel that it is unacceptable of me to point out that someone - who has written an open letter to MOPO making a definitive claim that they are no longer in the authentication business - is still in the authentication business.

neil

--- On Mon, 15/2/10, Bruce Hershenson <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:

From: Bruce Hershenson <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MOPO] POSTER MOUNTAIN / DRACULA / AUTHENTICATION
To: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
Date: Monday, 15 February, 2010, 0:08


"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" comes to mind.

SEAN, put that rock down right now!

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Neil Jaworski <<http://mc/[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
hi all

i don't know if any of you remember john davis' Dracula mea culpa of October 1st 2009 where he said that he accepts "100% of all blame for my mistake, and will gladly reject any more requests for authentications. I sincerely apologize for any and all harm that I have caused. And promise that it will not happen again because I will no longer offer authentication service, please give me a few days to change my web site..." (full email below).

i just glanced at his site and saw that there were at least a dozen 'authentication reports' so far in 2010, including - for those interested in irony - a report on a Dracula 1951R 1sh! this poster was found to be authentic and given a clean bill of health.

and so were all the other posters.

i admire a man who enjoys his work as much as john davis.

neil


It is absolutely true that I made an unfortunate mistake in my determination of authenticity of the Dracula poster. This was an honest mistake born of my ignorance of S2 reproductions and my lack of experience with the original Dracula poster. Joe Maddalena was in no way guilty of any wrong doing. His auction catalog was predicated on my expertise and I alone was fooled. I gladly accept 100% of all blame for my mistake, and will gladly reject any more requests for authentications. I sincerely apologize for any and all harm that I have caused. And promise that it will not happen again because I will no longer offer authentication service, please give me a few days to change my web site and to return all the new fakes that came in this week.


Sincerely,
John A. Davis
Poster Mountain Inc.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at <http://www.filmfan.com>www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: <http://mc/[email protected]>[email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at <http://www.filmfan.com>www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to