Richard,

I really hold you in high regard for engaging people about the "Portals". Early 
on I used to do that and mostly the response was negative, though sometimes 
people were appreciative. I remember a seller getting really indignant when I 
told him that I was sure his Frankenstein was a fake. After enduring the "what 
makes you an expert?" and "how could you know, when I have the poster in my 
hands and you are just guessing?" I asked the sell if there was a ZIP Code 
after Sausalito,Ca? The seller confirmed that there was a ZIP code. 

When I pointed out that ZIP codes went into general use in the early 70"s and 
the Poster said 1931 on it; the seller said that the ZIP was  printed on it 
later.

I am amazed at the range of human behaviour often enough.

Phil A
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Halegua Comic Art 
  To: Phillip W. Ayling ; [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] more on the King Kong poster


  Phillip

  obviously I am also trolling fleaBay looking for stuff. Yes, Bruce and 
Heritage and I all do better work - fleabay doesn't know what to do and they 
keep trying to find "that formula" without realizing they had the formula and 
abandoned it. But anyway, I usually don't post about the Portals.. I let our 
resident "echo" member do it.. there might not be much else for him to do.. But 
this listing was soooo laughable.. I had to post

  I helped someone else recognize what he had a couple weeks back on a Portal 
as well.
  I had bought a couple inserts from him, and he emailed me when he listed a 
March of the Wooden Soldiers poster, but the size was wrong. I asked if it had 
Portal productions in the border, he said yes & I educated him over the course 
of several emails and unlike 98% of the Portal sellers, he listened, changed 
his listing (it's on right now) and he was very appreciative for the knowledge. 
sadly, most people selling Portals know exactly what they are and know exactly 
what they are doing.. I think that goes for the current listing of the Kong

  Rich


  At 02:31 PM 2/18/2010, Phillip W. Ayling wrote:

    Re "King Kong"
     
    It also promises on the Feature listing itself "This one will sell" 
     
    An interesting thing for me is that even though we all recognize that E-bay 
is increasingly lame and our derision is loud and justified, Richard, I 
believe, first noticed this listing and posted it on MoPo within  40 minutes.
     
    I won't make suppositions about why, I would let him tell that story, but I 
would presume that many of us might have also have made that post had we been 
first to notice it.  I know for me, I notice those things because I still spend 
much time trolling E-Bay for the increasingly rare find. I imagine many of us 
will continue to do so,even if there is only rarely an auction of value.
     
    I would hate to know that one great poster was up for sale and I didn't 
notice it, and someone else did and they got it... even though I know that 
Richard and Bruce and Grey are all doing a better job than Ebay. 
     
    I rarely get much on E-Bay and even when I do, I still get taken. Yet, I 
still look.
     
    A couple of weeks ago, I noticed a low value Gene Autry card, and it was in 
better shape than the one I have. It isn't a card for which there are 
commercial repros available. It was also being sold by someone who sells mostly 
other stuff. The story goes that it had been theirs for some time and of course 
listing says "Original Vintage Gene Autry Lobby Card" 
     
    I also like to think that even though I am not a dealer and truly just a 
minor collector in the scheme of things, that I am smarter about posters than 
the average bear.
     
    I get the card; it is a Kinko's Copy.
    I contact seller and say this is not an "original Lobby card"
     
    Seller says; "I was told it was original"
     
    I reply;  "So was I"
     
    End of story; no further contact with seller and I have phony 
non-commercial repro of a $30 Lobby.
     
    Yet I will surf e-bay at some point today, even as I resent virtually 
everything about their operation. 
     
    Phil Ayling

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Richard Halegua Comic Art 

      To: [email protected] 

      Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:10 PM

      Subject: Re: [MOPO] more on the King Kong poster


      actually, aside from Faye Ray, the poster really is not a reproduction as 
that exact image with text blurbs etc, like the Drac & Frankenstein Portal 
posters, is not on any theatrical poster



      At 10:32 AM 2/18/2010, walter reuben wrote:

        hey guys

        you are missing the boat on that Portal King Kong poster.

        You have been making snarly comments about the guy who is selling it.

        You have totally not noticed that this is the ultra rare Portal version 
with "Fay Ray" or "Faye Ray."   The seller has gone to a lot of trouble to 
point this out.

        Walter

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

        ___________________________________________________________________

        How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

        Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

        In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

        The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

      ___________________________________________________________________

      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to