Mopoers,
Below is a detailed telling of the claims and counter claims regarding the  
suit between Jim Gresham and Debi Jacobson.  I was in hopes this would have 
 been adjudicated quietly but because of Sean Linkenback's continued 
attacks  against DebI Jacobson and Limagerie Gallery without any knowledge of 
the  
particulars in the case I feel morally bound to respond as I was intimately 
 aware of the details.  If anyone is interest in knowing the details  
continue reading. If not feel free to delete.  But this is a classic case  of 
the 
damage to a reputation and integrity of a seller mounted by an  internet 
troll with no knowledge of the details in a case.  I would like to  think that 
everyone now full informed about the case would now form  their own 
conclusions  and not depend on innuendo and outright lies.   Further there may 
exist lessons here of value for all of you when lawyers  become involved 
because 
as I clearly  demonstrate, they are the only people  who win. 
 
 

Sean,
   I find myself having to address your damning remarks  regarding the 
reputation of Debi Jacobson and  by  default myself.  First, how many times did 
I write you privately to  lay off your scurrilous attacks on parties 
involved in a legal case  whereupon they could not comment on litigation either 
privately or  in  a public forum...............something you damn well  knew.
 
    But you persisted, and I have reason to  believe motivated by no other 
reason  than harboring a mean spirited sensibility bordering on  
sociopathic. Why was it your business?  I have to say I find it hard  to 
believe that 
Jim Gresham would have put you up to this as, based on my  numerous personal 
dealings, sales and wonderful conversations, he would  never stand idly by 
and allow some bystander to launch slurs and  lies disparaging the reputation 
of a gallery/dealer.  Especially one  from whom he had profited greatly 
over the year with substantial  sales. Further Jim was held silent as he too 
could not weigh in  based on his legal action
 
So if I may review the salient-points of the case. So Sean I start  with 
one of your many  quotes

 
 

"An honest and reputable dealer would have been  proactive." 
 
Sean, using your words that is exactly how this transaction  began.  
Regarding the card in question,  your friend Kerry Haggard  wanted to apply a 
Frankenstein card towards the purchase of a SON OF  FRANKENSTEIN insert Debi 
acquired from Jim Gresham and asked that I present it  to Debi, as, for lack of 
better term, "alternative currency"   When I received the card I called him 
to tell him I had a problem with it -  that it did not look as vibrant as 
the jpegs of similar cards I  researched on Heritage's website.  He then 
claimed Heritage color  enhanced and other nonsense.  Actually that registered 
a 
bit of an alarm  in my head even having met Kerry in person with Ron Magid 
But then again  he was on the cover of Movie Collector's World, written up 
in news items,  truly "the good-old boy" of the hobby and of course long 
recommended  by Jim Gresham himself.
 
Delivered the card to Debi. Kerry did not want her to know he was  
acquiring the SON OF FRANKENSTEIN insert  for fear she would charge  more,  a 
ridiculous assumption as everyone in the hobby knew her  price for the piece. 
But 
I have assisted other collectors who wished to  remain anonymous so that was 
not at all  unusual.

 

Upon presentation Debi immediately  agreed the card looked washed out and 
dull. I left the card with her to  consider.   A very few days  went by and 
Haggard was becoming  increasingly impatient as expressed on my voice mail 
and numerous  emails.   When I mentioned to Kerry I  actually wanted to  get 
opinions on the card, he angrily objected and did not want "  in-experienced 
yahoos pawing over his card".   Well I had it in a  sleeve!
 
( NOTE:  THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION I FOUND OUT LATER) At that  point Debi 
contacted Jim Gresham about the card to gauge his  opinion.  Evidently, Jim 
expressed an interest in the  card.  With repeated emails to back this up, 
Debi clearly  stated that she had a problem with the card and truly was not an 
expert  on Universal Horror lobby cards.   

 
 

Then Cinevent rolls around and  Jim Gresham and Kerry attend.  At that 
point they agreed to the sale of  the card.  I immediately receive an email 
from 
Kerry stating  as such.  Well I was dumbfounded. Initially Kerry asked me  
specifically not to approach Jim regarding the card as he did not want to 
hurt  his feelings by not offering the card to him first. Secondly I  didn't 
know that Debi had contacted Jim about the card.  Talk about  blind-sided!  
Anyway these issues were reconciled  between  Kerry and Jim at Cinevent being 
close friends. The two  agreed to the purchase face to  face.  

 
 

Kerry immediately notified me by email regarding  his sale to Jim.   I 
immediately emailed him back clearly  stating I was not sure that was possible 
as I STILL HAD A PROBLEM WITH A  CARD AND CERTAINLY DIDN'T WANT ANY PROBLEMS 
DOWN THE  LINE.  (Yes this and all other emails to Kerry I had saved)  Here 
was his most friendly reply
 
 

Jesus Christ freeman....................whats the deal, i am sick of  
waiting , i am just ready to have you send all my money & cards back if  this 
isnt going to go , i have just had it with debbi & her Jew ways!!  



Then that shocking email  was followed with another  email whereupon as Jim 
had agreed to the  purchase Kerry  instructed me to go pick up the card at  
Limagerie and Fed Ex to Jim so there was no delays in his receipt of the  
card adding (sic)  tell that bitch to send my  insert..  


  
 
I think it was the next day Debi received a check from Jim  Gresham for the 
card ( a payment reflecting a sizeable  CREDIT  for a check Debi had paid 
to Jim some 4 years  earlier but that Jim forgot to cash......which she 
immediately  agreed to honor  --- a REPUTABLE AND HONORABLE thing to do would 
you 
 not agree SEAN?) She emailed Jim regarding her surprise after  receiving 
the payment as she still  had not agreed to the  deal due to her problem with 
the card. 

 
 Well having sent the card  I contacted Jim two days later knowing he had 
received the card.   Friendly as always,  he stated the card was fine and 
that he had  contacted Debi  to deposit the check.  At that point I shared  
with Jim how difficult Kerry had become during the transaction, how  odd his 
demanding of me NOT to mention to  him about the card then  Kerry's position 
reversal of secrecy and  revealing to Jim  he was the owner of The 
Frankenstein Card and  that  his purchase would aid his acquisition of the 
insert.  
And of  course I mentioned to Jim  that  Debi and I had problem with the  
damned lobby card,  Nevertheless Jim expressed total confidence in the  card 
BECAUSE HE CALLED KERRY upon receipt  and discussed its merits with  him.  Yes, 
Jim was fooled and defrauded again by his  friend Kerry and worse,  face to 
face.   UNBELIEVABLE AND  DESPICABLE CONDUCT BY KERRY HAGGARD. 



Since Jim initiated the lawsuit for collection of the card, Debi  had to 
answer in the legal process as well..  That is  when it became apparent to 
your's truly  THAT THERE IS NOT A LAWYER  ON EARTH THAT SINCERELY LOOKS OUT FOR 
THE BENEFIT OF THEIR CLIENTS.   (Claude Litton excepted)  Because Debi  
shared with me the  immediate expenses incurring and then their  spiking 
escalation.  Truthfully it seemed to me all  the legal teams involved engage 
frivolous filings and extensions merely  to run up fees  To my mind and  very 
shallow  pockets,  this was approaching the absurd. 
 
 Specific to the case three separate attorneys in two states could  not 
find any precedence regarding the unique issues regarding this  transaction.
1) The liability of  the terms of sale known as "on  approval" or for that 
matter "as is" of an item between two  parties.
2) The expressly stated reservations and  warnings about said item.
3) That the agreement of sale was approved and concluded in  person by the 
second and a third party (who owned the item  outright) removing completely 
any control and direction of  the  transaction from the first party in spite 
clearly  expressed reservations  

   (Yeesh this sounds  like a Marx Bros sketch)

 
So Sean it should be clear now you were clearly wrong regarding your  
assumption of the case. Yet SEAN you and others continued with no  knowledge of 
the particulars had so publicly demonized Debi's reputation  repeatedly with 
malice and prejudice without a scintilla of regard  especially knowing she 
could not offer any refutation. The only way out  for her it seemed was to 
follow it to court to defend her character  and reputation. 
 
YES! There were some that felt  just pay it off and  be done with it.    
Easier to say than done in light of  the dollars involved for the item and  
after such horrible  attacks on very visible websites  worldwide. Would not 
anyone  feel obliged if not all together empowered  to embrace  one's 
principals for some sense of closure and  redemption? 
 
 Well  it soon became apparent to me  that the words Principals and 
Attorneys in the same  sentence are clearly an oxymoron.  (not  you Claude)
 
Intimately involved with both parties and their expenses  I  FINALLY 
STEPPED UP AND OFFERED TO BROKER A SETTLEMENT between my two  
friends........something five attorneys could not get done.  I am pleased  that 
I was able to 
bring both Debi and Jim together and the case's dismissal  is eminent.  And 
may I say the settlement was in my  hopes to remain under the radar consistent 
with my pleas for  discretion all along.  Further no admission of guilt or 
wrong doing  IS clearly stated in the documents regarding both parties.
 
AND SEAN I HAVE EVERY REASON TO BELIEVE YOU KNEW THIS SETTLEMENT WAS  
NEARLY COMPLETED  and yet you continued to wrongfully vilify Debi's  
reputation, 
integrity and honesty enabling others to follow same.  This continued 
egregious behavior was personally infuriating and  malicious  after I tried 
since 
last September, privately, and no  less than five times to appeal to your 
better self (now obvious to all  non-existent)  to refrain from such 
unprofessional behavior.  But Sean you continued to disparage maliciously 
Limagerie 
and  Debi Jacobson,  knowing  better than anyone her inability to  respond.  
 
And do not think for a second your attacks had anything to precipitate  a 
settlement. Nothing could be further from the truth.  Sean you owe Debi  
Jacobson an apology for your continued and fallacious attacks. Man up and  
demonstrate some semblance of integrity.  For now, all you  have confirmed is 
what a slime-ball, scum sucking, poop  sniffing, warp minded, yeast infected, 
snot-nosed,  yellow bellied,  cold-blooded bullying jack-ass you truly 
are................
 
 On second thought you might make a perfect  lawyer......so study hard for 
the bar your bound to pass  eventually.

 

.
freeman  fisher

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to