A Refresher...

Here guys, get 'em a room together. I'll be there shortly with 'refreshments..'

Ted


On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Douglas Ball <[email protected]>
 wrote:









I just got done with and auction on 
Mopobid tonight 
that is and will leave a sour taste and just might make me think twice 
in 
bidding on another auction in the near future on Rich's auctions.
Tonight I bid on "Robinson Crusoe on Mars" 
40x60. 
At 8:18 tonight a buyer with the ID of samiam101 (0) feedback with 
approx. 2mins 
left in the auction. I came in again at 8:27 almost missing the auction.
 I was 
high at 105.01. From that bid until 9:05, that bidder bid 27 bids @ 
$2.00 per 
bid w/ 3 or 2m left in the extended auction until the bidder finally won
 it for 
$161.10.
Now I'M like just about anyone else who
 takes 
loosing with winning, but in this case I believe it was not a bidder who
 never 
bid on any auctions in the past, but a shill bidder.
Since you can not view auctions that 
have ended on 
Rich's site unless you bid or follow, I'm just curious how many others 
had an 
experience tonight with samiam 101 with (0) feedback!
 
Doug



--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Sean Linkenback <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Sean Linkenback <[email protected]>
Subject: [MOPO] My Totally Different bidding experience on MovieposterBid.com
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 11:43 AM



 
 

I am a new bidder on www.MoviePosterBid.com and last night I 
thought I had just completed a mini-bid war with monimaker and poems71 over a 
40"x60" Robinson Crusoe on Mars poster - in fact the high bid hadn't changed 
for 
over 3 minutes so I was pretty sure I had the piece won at $125.01 when all of 
a 
sudden some other bidder came in at the last second and beat my high bid by 
$1!!!  WTF?!?!
 
Well I wasn't going to let this guy get the best of 
me by $1, so I quickly entered a bid of $127.05 - figuring I would get him by 
$1.04 just to be sure.
But wouldn't you know it - he was still high bid by 
$1.
It took me a minute to figure this out, but it was 
only $1 so I thought I would try $1 more.  But guess what - he was still 
high bidder and now I saw that he even had the nerve to just place another bid 
at 8:34. (Why would he do that when he was already winning?  What was going 
on here?)
 
This poster was still a bargain - especially in 
this rare size and with the book coming out about 40"x60"s I decided I would 
give it another shot.  I kept going up little by little, hoping to win the 
poster for the least amount I could and I guess he finally gave up after 
awhile.  it took a full 30 minutes, but finally I was high bidder again 
just after 9pm and for $161.
 
So my question to the group is this - Do you think 
that other guy was shill bidding?  I mean obviously I had the poster nearly 
won a full 30 minutes earlier for $125.01, and then the guy (maybe the 
consignor?) decided that wasn't enough and he outbid me knowing I really, 
really 
wanted this poster.  Then when he saw I would play his game and keep 
bidding, he made a couple of more tiny bids just to squeeze a few extra dollars 
out of me.
 
This has really left a sour taste in my mouth and 
if I didn't know that Rich was an honest seller it might really make me think 
twice about bidding again in his auctions.
 
SamiamVisit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.






         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to