Not really sure why they restricted themselves to daybills. The art on the one 
sheets was often inferior to the daybills. I feel that the Richardson posters 
from the 30s and 40s are the standouts. 
Regards
John


Website: www.moviemem.com
 
JOHN REID VINTAGE MOVIE MEMORABILIA
PO Box 92
Palm Beach
Qld 4221
Australia
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Gerrard 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 9:27 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Richardon Daybills


  Thanks John. Any idea why they restricted themselves to daybills? – would 
have thought it most cost-effective for studio/distributor to get everything 
done in one place. In any case, great example of what a company (presumably 
mostly guided by John Richardson himself) can achieve by putting a little extra 
effort in. Not all hit the mark, but the use of colour on some of them – 
particularly shading and background - is quite amazing.

   

  Paul

  www.movieposterstudio.com

  In a message dated 11/06/2010 22:46:16 GMT Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:
    Hi Paul
    In answer to your question, the Richardson Studio only produced daybills 
from the 20s through to the late 50s. 
    You can see many of them in my exhibition .....
    http://www.moviemem.com/pages/gallery.php?cat=20
    Regards
    John

  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to