"It came with two pair of glasses which oddly needed charging"
That's because Samsung among others uses Active 3D and a few other brands use 
Passive 3D.
At the moment active-shutter glasses are more expensive, and often hard to use 
for prolonged periods of time, but give a better 3D image.
You can read more here:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/225218/active_3d_vs_passive_3d.html
http://www.3dtvtechnology.org.uk/passive-versus-active
Ron
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Gresham 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:18 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] SOMEWHAT OFF TOPIC: 3-D FIZZLE?


  Roland, you mentioned 3D tv's.  Our TV recently died and I found a nice 
Samsung to repalce it.  One of the options the Samsung came with was 3D.  It 
came with two pair of glasses which oddly needed charging.  While I could have 
cared less about this option, I must say with those glasses, on the Samsung TV 
we have seen some incredible 3D effects.  I think the TV is much better then 
the theater experience for 3D.  It is actually wonderful.  It came as a 
wonderful surprise how good it is.  JIm


  On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Roland Lataille 
<[email protected]> wrote:

    If this continues, maybe they will have more screens doing 3-D than flat. 
Here in Connecticut, the Manchester Rave theatres are showing Pirates of the 
Caribbean: On Stranger Tides in flat, Disney Digital 3D and Imax 3D.

    I work in retail and we do sell a large number of 3D ready TV sets. So 
maybe people are staying home to watch the same movie in 3D?




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Kirby McDaniel <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 10:16 AM
    Subject: [MOPO] SOMEWHAT OFF TOPIC: 3-D FIZZLE?


    Will History Repeat Itself?  from today's NY Times

    Kirby McDaniel
    www.movieart.net

    May 29, 2011
    3-D Starts to Fizzle, and Hollywood Frets
    By BROOKS BARNES and MICHAEL CIEPLY
    LOS ANGELES — Has the 3-D boom already gone bust? It’s starting to look 
that way — at least for American moviegoers — even as Hollywood prepares to 
release a glut of the gimmicky pictures.

    Ripples of fear spread across Hollywood last week after “Pirates of the 
Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” which cost Walt Disney Studios an estimated $400 
million to make and market, did poor 3-D business in North America. While event 
movies have typically done 60 percent of their business in 3-D, “Stranger 
Tides” sold just 47 percent in 3-D. “The American consumer is rejecting 3-D,” 
Richard Greenfield, an analyst at the financial services company BTIG, wrote of 
the “Stranger Tides” results.

    One movie does not make a trend, but the Memorial Day weekend did not give 
studio chiefs much comfort in the 3-D department. “Kung Fu Panda 2,” a 
Paramount Pictures release of a DreamWorks Animation film, sold $53.8 million 
in tickets from Thursday to Sunday, a soft total, and 3-D was 45 percent of the 
business, according to Paramount.

    Consumer rebellion over high 3-D ticket prices plays a role, and the 
novelty of putting on the funny glasses is wearing off, analysts say. But there 
is also a deeper problem: 3-D has provided an enormous boost to the strongest 
films, including “Avatar” and “Alice in Wonderland,” but has actually undercut 
middling movies that are trying to milk the format for extra dollars.

    “Audiences are very smart,” said Greg Foster, the president of Imax Filmed 
Entertainment. “When they smell something aspiring to be more than it is, they 
catch on very quickly.”

    Muddying the picture is a contrast between the performance of 3-D movies in 
North America and overseas. If results are troubling domestically, they are the 
exact opposite internationally, where the genre is a far newer phenomenon. 
Indeed, 3-D screenings powered “Stranger Tides” to about $256 million on its 
first weekend abroad; Disney trumpeted the figure as the biggest international 
debut of all time.

    With results like that at a time when movies make 70 percent of their total 
box office income outside North America, do tastes at home even matter?

    After a disappointing first half of the year, Hollywood is counting on a 
parade of 3-D films to dig itself out of a hole. From May to September, the 
typical summer season, studios will unleash 16 movies in the format, more than 
double the number last year. Among the most anticipated releases are 
“Transformers: Dark of the Moon,” due from Paramount on July 1, and Part 2 of 
Part 7 of the “Harry Potter” series, arriving two weeks later from Warner 
Brothers.

    The need is urgent. The box-office performance in the first six months of 
2011 was soft — revenue fell about 9 percent compared with last year, while 
attendance was down 10 percent — and that comes amid decay in 
home-entertainment sales. In all formats, including paid streaming and DVDs, 
home entertainment revenue fell almost 10 percent, according to the Digital 
Entertainment Group.

    The first part of the year held a near collapse in video store rentals, 
which fell 36 percent to about $440 million, offsetting gains from cut-price 
rental kiosks and subscriptions. In addition, the sale of packaged discs fell 
about 20 percent, to about $2.2 billion, while video-on-demand, though growing, 
delivered total sales of less than a quarter of that amount.

    At the box office, animated films, which have recently been Hollywood’s 
most reliable genre, have fallen into a deep trough, as the category’s top 
three performers combined — “Rio,” from Fox; “Rango,” from Paramount; and 
“Hop,” from Universal — have had fewer ticket buyers than did “Shrek the 
Third,” from DreamWorks Animation, after its release in mid-May four years ago.

    “Kung Fu Panda 2” appears poised to become the biggest animated hit of the 
year so far; but it would have to stretch well past its own predecessor to beat 
“Shrek Forever After,” another May release, which took in $238.7 million last 
year.

    For the weekend, “The Hangover: Part II” sold $118 million from Thursday to 
Sunday, easily enough for No. 1. “Kung Fu Panda 2” was second. Disney’s 
“Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides” was third with $39.3 million for 
a new total of $152.9 million. “Bridesmaids” (Universal Pictures) was fourth 
with $16.4 million for a new total of about $85 million. “Thor” (Marvel 
Studios) rounded out the top five with $9.4 million for a new total of $160 
million.

    Studio chiefs acknowledge that the industry needs to sort out its 3-D 
strategy. Despite the soft results for “Kung Fu Panda 2,” animated releases 
have continued to perform well in the format, overcoming early problems with 
glasses that didn’t fit little faces. But general-audience movies like 
“Stranger Tides” may be better off the old-fashioned way.

    “With a blockbuster-filled holiday weekend skewing heavily toward 2-D, and 
3-D ticket sales dramatically underperforming relative to screen allocation, 
major studios will hopefully begin to rethink their 3-D rollout plans for the 
rest of the year and 2012,” Mr. Greenfield said on Friday.

            Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
      ___________________________________________________________________
                  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                        
          Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
                In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                        
        The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




  -- 



  Jim Gresham
  18501 Henry Ct
  Ray Mi 48096
  586 677-7669

  www.theyreherealreadybook.com



  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to