Studios all claim bragging rights even when they are silly. A new movie that 
absolutely bombed in its first week and comes in 6th place behind 2 existing 
comedies, an animated film, a Rom-Com, Fast and Furious 17 and a Weinstein 
period drama, will have the trailers adjusted in the second week to say "Go see 
America's number 1 non-sequel Action film"

In Southern California, Paramount claims to be the oldest Film Producer in 
continuous production by a couple of months. I have never seen Universal 
dispute this. Universal's claim is that Universal City is the oldest Studio 
facility in continuous operation. Paramount Studios started in a place called 
the Jess Lasky (later Cecil B. DeMille) Barn that now sits across from the 
Hollywood Bowl, but was originally near Sunset and Vine. It is generally 
believed that barn is the "studio stage" where the first "Hollywood" feature 
was made. Paramount did not move into their current facilities until about 
1926. It was adjacent to facilities used by Pathe/Orpheum/RKO (not sure of 
ownership stake at that time). Desilu later bought RKO and Paramount acquired 
Desilu later. So the current Paramount lot also includes the old Hollywood RKO 
stages and you can still sell the remnants of the RKO Globe at the Gower and 
Melrose corner of the Paramount lot.

William Fox studios (before they merged with 20th) were in Hollywood at Western 
and Sunset Blvd. That place became a shopping mall when I was in High School. 
Fox had a huge ranch facility in what became Century City. In late 1929 that is 
where they started building the first of their soundstages for talkies and that 
location eventually became their principal location. The Hollywood facility and 
the Century City backlot were casualties of increased SoCal land value and the 
huge over-runs of Cleopatra.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bruce Hershenson 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 7:00 AM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] I found a significant mistake that a major studio made!


  Universal has a similar convoluted past. Carl Laemmle was originally just a 
film distributor but sometime in 1912 he made his first short movie, and he 
made tons of them in New Jersey over the next three years (but no features), 
and then moved to California in 1915 (when he opened Universal City, and it had 
tours for the public that year!).

  So depending on how you look at it, Universal pre-dates Paramount by 3 years.

  The third early giant was William Fox, and he started in 1915, but quickly 
had huge success. He was in the top rank of the studios in the 1920s, and in 
1929 he had a firm deal to buy MGM, and the combined company would surely have 
been the number one studio, but the stock market crash wrecked the deal. He 
also made a terrible move in being the sole studio to continue producing major 
silent releases in 1929, and those two disasters ruined him personally.

  Bruce


  On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Dave Rosen <[email protected]> wrote:

    Ya know, bad math and typos aside, the fact that a movie studio has been 
around for 100 years (or ALMOST 100 years) is pretty impressive. Not that 
studios today are what they were then, but still. Is Paramount the oldest US 
studio, or is it Universal? Seems to me Universal's been around since 1912.

    Dave

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Bruce Hershenson 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:38 AM
      Subject: Re: [MOPO] I found a significant mistake that a major studio 
made!


      Zeev

      It IS higher math, and my typo confused things more.

      They started as the "Paramount Program" which was separate studios 
releasing their product jointly, IN 1912. They didn't actually merge into a 
single real studio until 1915.

      So their true "100th Anniversary" isn't for 3 more years. But they wanted 
to celebrate NOW, so they made 2012 the 100th birthday, counting the three 
"Paramount Program" years.

      But in their press release, someone wrote that they didn't even use their 
famous logo until 1916, in print or onscreen, and that is what was wrong, and 
what I disproved!


      On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Zeev Drach <[email protected]> wrote:

        1916, 1915, or 1914, the math still doesn’t work.  1915+75=1990.  So 
what gives?



        Leonard Maltin talks about the 100th  anniversary, but that still 
doesn’t work.  1915+100=2015!



        Am I misunderstanding the article or Bruce’s comment?



        Zeev 



        From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Bruce Hershenson
        Sent: December 23, 2011 7:31 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [MOPO] I found a significant mistake that a major studio made!



        Wow! I found a significant mistake that a major studio made! Paramount 
Pictures said that this year was the 75th anniversary of their famous logo, 
because it was first used in 1916. But I knew otherwise, and proved it was used 
as early as August, 1914, so they were off by two years. Read about it Leonard 
Maltin's fine site here:

        http://blogs.indiewire.com/leonardmaltin/paramount-logo-revisited

        -- 
        Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
        P.O. Box 874
        West Plains, MO 65775
        Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we 
take lunch)
        our site
        our auctions




        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

        ___________________________________________________________________

        How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

        Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

        In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

        The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




      -- 
      Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
      P.O. Box 874
      West Plains, MO 65775
      Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we 
take lunch)
      our site
      our auctions




      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
      ___________________________________________________________________
      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




  -- 
  Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
  P.O. Box 874
  West Plains, MO 65775
  Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take 
lunch)
  our site
  our auctions




  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to