Agreed.  This was mid-level Woody Allen at best.  I couldn't understand what 
the fuss was about.  And the "American" family
in that film - a bunch of right-wing bores - what a tired idea.  Would have 
been funnier to make them American lefties more liberal than thou!
Still, it wasn't entirely boring.  Great shots of Paris.  Who needs a star when 
you have Paris.  We'll always have Paris, won't we?
K.

On Feb 27, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Posteropolis wrote:

> Franc, Woody got Best Original Screenplay, which I thought was weird, 
> considering what a tired idea for a movie it was.
>  
> Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Franc
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Oscars
> 
> I actually thought it was one of the LEAST boring Oscar telecasts I've seen 
> in a long time but then again I record the show on my DVR and only began to 
> watch it at around 9.30 PM EST with a remote control in my hand. By the time 
> 11 o'clock rolled around I was completely caught up, having not listened to 
> any of the acceptance speeches I wasn't interested in or the commercials. 
> (You do the math on that one.) I thought Billy Crystal got it right almost 
> all night. I thought some of the choices on the video packages were strange 
> especially the In Memorial segment which featured almost all still photos, 
> odd for an event celebrating motion pictures. I didn't miss having to sit 
> through the two ghastly Best Songs but the package assembled for Best Movie 
> of the Year was wrong-headed, intercutting the clips from the best films so 
> that one never got a taste for any of the nine films, just a stupid idea. I 
> wasn't too upset with the actual awards last night, although I wish Hugo had 
> taken either Best Movie or Best Direction. I was frankly expecting an old 
> guard backlash with the totally ordinary The Descendants and George Clooney 
> winning top awards and I'm glad that didn't happen. I would have preferred 
> Viola Davis or Michelle Williams rather than Meryl Streep winning for a 
> strong performance in an absolutely ghastly film but I'm also glad Woody 
> Allen didn't win for his latest warmed-over opus.  I guess I'm mellowing. 
> FRANC  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph 
> Bonelli
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Oscars
> 
> Sorry to disagree, Bruce, but several of us thought that, though it wasn't 
> the greatest, that last night's Oscar presentation at LEAST paid attention to 
> the professionals, living and passed on, who make up the world of 
> movies...unlike the last two years when the production tried to cater to the 
> People's Choice and Teeny-bop Awards. We could actually see the entire 
> audience in the beautiful theatre last night--  instead of having it 
> decorated like a studio for a game show, complete with peanut gallerey 
> screaming, "Pick me!"
> Sorry, but SOMEONE has to take the higher road.  I believe that OSCAR needs 
> to be that someone. 
> There is a huge international audience for the Oscars which negates the 
> necessity to cater to the US's Text-Sending Teeny-Set.  Don't worry about 
> them.. Michael Bay & the Vampire Crew. will see to it that they are well 
> entertained and spend lots and lots of mommy-daddy money at the concession 
> stands...and the grownups can snooze with pleasure through an Oscar program 
> that  honors "Hugo" rather than "Transformers".
> When Oscar becomes the People's Choice, excellence in film will be buried 
> under a heap of poot jokes and CGI. 
> Sorry if my comments seem old-fashioned, but that's the way this movie fan 
> sees it.
>  
> Joe B in NOLA
>  
> PS-- I thought the awards were well-apportioned on the whole.  This year was 
> all about the Nomination being the thing--- an excellent year for film.
> PPS-- But the choice NOT to bestow special honors on the "Potter" series with 
> it's decade-long history of excellence in everything, was unfortunate...the 
> night's biggest failing in my estimation.
> Joe
>  
> From: Bruce Hershenson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 6:55 AM
> Subject: [MOPO] The Oscars
> 
> It's the morning after, and overall, I thought it was a real snoozefest, 
> Billy Crystal was entertaining, but SO familiar in everything he did and 
> said. And was I the only one who kept wondering if he might have looked and 
> performed better if he hadn't had his very obvious plastic surgery? And isn't 
> it a bad sign when the best segment was the circus art, which has zero to do 
> with movies.
> 
> It hit me when they did the "In Memorium" segment, and there were tons of 
> behind the scenes people no one knows, with a few famous faces thrown in. 
> They have successfully turned the Oscars into the Golden Globes, filled with 
> insiders and inside jokes, where they pretty much ignore the viewing public, 
> and give the awards to the movies THEY like. the kind that the critics fawn 
> over, but which not many people actually see.
> 
> Of course, this transformation has been going on for many years, but at least 
> they used to pretend to care about the people who make it all possible, those 
> who buy the tickets. And in a day when movies face more and more competition 
> from all sorts of other kinds of entertainment, it may not be just the awards 
> ceremony that sees its number of viewers continuing to fall in coming years.
> 
> This was once must-viewing for me. and I have watched it every year, but I 
> think I will skip it next year.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> -- 
> Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com team
> P.O. Box 874
> West Plains, MO 65775
> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1 when we take 
> lunch)
> our site
> our auctions
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
> database 6919 (20120227) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> 


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to