I agree, Kirby.
I was disagreeing with Bruce's assesment that horror posters were THE  
most common of the period.

On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:59 PM, "Kirby McDaniel" <[email protected]>  
wrote:

> Grey et al,
>
> What I was intending to communicate is that I think with HORROR  
> posters, there was an early-on cult of collectors for this stuff in  
> a way
> that there wasn't for standard Hollywood fare, even A-picture  
> Hollywood Fare like comedies, drama, biopics etc.  Westerns have  
> some of this
> same genre-based history, I think, too.  So people from a much  
> earlier period had an interest in aggregating posters.
>
>
>
> K.
>
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Smith, Grey - 1367 wrote:
>
>> I disagree.
>> The only reason we are aware, more or less, of exact counts on the  
>> horror posters for these classics is that they are so actively  
>> desired and collected and that counts have been made of what  
>> exists. They are very collectible.
>> If a group of collectors is buying Bankhead I can almost assure you  
>> that they know how many known copies of Devil and the Deep and  
>> Faithless are out there. They are keeping track of it and there are  
>> no doubt as many copies of some of those titles as the horror  
>> classics.
>> Just as those in the collecting circles for Bogart know how many  
>> for Petrified Forest are known or for Cagney, Footlight Parade or  
>> Hard to Hold.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  
>> Kirby McDaniel
>> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 12:34 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] An auction house to avoid
>>
>> Bruce is correct here.  If as many folks had been as enamored of  
>> Tallulah Bankhead as were of Bela Lugosi, you might be able to find  
>> the occasional one sheet of THE CHEAT.
>>
>> K.
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:
>>
>>> Good poit Jay. I contend that the Universal horror titles of the  
>>> 1930s
>>> are often among the most COMMON posters for those years! Can you  
>>> find
>>> many 1931 titles where there are more one-sheets known than
>>> Frankenstein? Or 1933 titles where there are more one-sheets known
>>> than King Kong?
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> On 4/13/12, Jay Nemeth-Johannes  
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Well, I have items that I believe are one of a kind.  For example  
>>>> a 1
>>>> sheet for a Richard Dix silent "The Glorious Fool", but I have no  
>>>> way
>>>> to prove it is unique.  I expect that much of the paper for early
>>>> silents is rare to nonexistant, especially for lost films.
>>>>
>>>> It is easier when the film is iconic and everyone is trying to find
>>>> an example.  Any Dracula find is going to get widespread press.
>>>>
>>>> My guess on why some stuff is more available is pure chance that it
>>>> was initially printed in too large a quantity and somebody  
>>>> warehoused
>>>> it for decades.  Laziness rules where a more efficient person  
>>>> throws
>>>> away the "useless" trash.
>>>>
>>>>  Jay
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/13/12 11:16 AM, Phillip W. Ayling wrote:
>>>>> It would be great if these same all-knowing censustakers could  
>>>>> also
>>>>> tell us "three known fakes currently being offered". While it  
>>>>> makes
>>>>> big news whenever a Dracula one-sheet or a Chaplain 6sheet is  
>>>>> found
>>>>> in a barn, I wouldn't be surprised if amongst MoPo members there  
>>>>> are
>>>>> some items that are extremely rare or have never been  
>>>>> inventoried by
>>>>> an auction house, so "they don't exist".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for any insight anyone might have.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>>            How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>>
>>>>     Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>>>          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>>
>>>>  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruce Hershenson and the other 24 members of the eMoviePoster.com  
>>> team
>>> P.O. Box 874 West Plains, MO 65775
>>> Phone: 417-256-9616 (hours: Mon-Fri 9 to 5 except from 12 to 1  
>>> when we
>>> take
>>> lunch)
>>> our site <http://www.emovieposter.com/> our auctions
>>> <http://www.emovieposter.com/agallery/all.html>
>>> <http://www.emovieposter.com/unused/signature/20111028Frankensteinempl
>>> oyeegroupphotosignature.jpg>
>>>
>>>       Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>> ___________________________________________________________________
>>>            How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>>
>>>     Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>>          In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>>
>>>  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>>
>>        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>  ___________________________________________________________________
>>             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>
>>      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>
>>   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>>
>>        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
>>  ___________________________________________________________________
>>             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>>
>>      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
>>           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>>
>>   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
>

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to