Mike Kaplan has a blog on Huffington Post.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-kaplan

Brandon
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Geraldine Kudaka 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: June 24, 2012 11:18
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Rich - Pelham poster


  Our Pelham copy wasn't rolled.


  Interesting that you are having hard time finding info on it.


  We really didn't know what we had in our collection because we weren't into 
buying and selling. When we started thinking about selling and realized the 
first step was going to be identifying what we had, it seemed like an 
insurmountable task. So I'm surprised at how hard it is for you -- a collector 
-- to find the information. And to what lengths you have to go to find the 
information. Here, I'm assuming you have movie poster guides and reference 
materials on your desk, but not finding what you need in your resources -- well 
that's interesting. And contacting Kubrick's archive -- that's impressive.



  Kinda reminds me of Abel Gance's Napolean. The amount of research necessary 
to get the info you need -- in Gance's case, it was Kevin Brownlow's life long 
obsession with the film that resulted in its reconstruction. 



  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napol%C3%A9on_%281927_film%29


  I don't know if Mike Kaplan is still alive -- he was older than Charley -- 
but he certainly would know. 



  In fact -- if one could find him -- you'd have the info you needed to know 
and probably from the best source. Filmmakers don't think of the posters -- 
they think of their films -- and the poster artist generally is thinking of 
their whole artistic career, so Kaplan would really know why the Pelham was 
made and what happened to that campaign.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Richard C Evans <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 1:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [MOPO] Rich - Pelham poster



  Thanks Geraldine.


  Very difficult to find info on this, have already made extensive efforts.


  Though I'm reasonably sure the printing (though not the design it's based on) 
originates in the US.


  Next step for me is the Kubrick archive, who have told me on the telephone 
they have nothing relating to this poster, (but they do have Bill Gold's 
cruxifiction design which Kubrick rejected). They may though have something 
relating to it in Kubrick's communications with WB. 


  Whether it did actually ran or is a print run of a proposed poster, still no 
clue.


  Does seem that these only come to market rolled and via execs, though I may 
be wrong on that.


  Thanks for the info, much appreciated.

  Sent from my iPhone

  On 24 Jun 2012, at 18:18, Geraldine Kudaka <[email protected]> wrote:


    When Charley first worked at MGM, Mike Kaplan was his boss. 2001 had opened 
initially a "Hardware" campagn, it had a good box office but shortly after 
opening fell off at the box office. Mike convinced Kubrick that they should 
replace the Hardware campaign with the Star Child campaign. The Star Child 
campaign was a massive hit, bringing is a huge resurgence at the box office. It 
was the BO success of 2001 that convinced 20th Century/Fox to fund Star Wars.



    2001 huge success is evidenced by these figures -- in Dec. 75, the film 
broke even. In March, 1976, Kubrick received his first profit sharing residual 
check. 



    March 1976 was the same month Star Wars started filming

    After conceiving the Star Child campaign for 2001, Mike Kaplan left MGM and 
went to work for Kubrick on Clockwork Orange. When Charley was in London 
working on Star Wars, Mike gave him posters. 

    Any other history on the Pelham poster or its availability would be best to 
find by googling UK.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: Richard Evans <[email protected]>
    To: Geraldine Kudaka <[email protected]> 
    Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
    Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 10:53 AM
    Subject: Re: [MOPO] Rich - Pelham poster



    Thanks Geraldine, no rush.

    Sent from my iPad

    On 24 Jun 2012, at 14:15, Geraldine Kudaka <[email protected]> wrote:


      It's Sunday morning and Charley's still asleep so i can't ask him about 
the Pelham Clockwork Orange.


      I'll find out later today and let you know. 

      Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
      ___________________________________________________________________
      How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
      Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
      In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
      The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    ___________________________________________________________________
    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
    Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



  Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
  Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
  In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
  The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to