i agree with what you say , my remark was regarding Bruce his phrase   " I 
wouldn't think this could extend to movie posters, could it? Of course eBay has 
done stranger things before! "   it is not ebay that decides anything in this 
matter , it's law ,  any impact on ebay would be the same as the impact on 
emovieposter.com and any other US movie poster sellers . That said , since  
most movie posters  were issued for promotion ,  NOT sold commercialy i think 
this is a different subject . 
 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:11:22 -0500
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MOPO] Right to re-sell imperiled??
To: [email protected]



Re: [MOPO] Right to re-sell imperiled??


Here is the link to the USSC casefile, which includes the basic argument:



The question presented is how these provisions apply to a copy that was made 
and legally acquired abroad and then imported into the United States. Can such 
a foreign-made product never be resold within the United States without the 
copyright owner's permission, as the Second Circuit held in this case? Can such 
a foreign-made product sometimes be resold within the United States without 
permission, but only after the owner approves an earlier sale in this country, 
as the Ninth Circuit held in Costco? Or can such a product always be resold 
without permission within the United States, so long as the copyright owner 
authorized the first sale abroad, as the Third Circuit has indicated?



http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/11-00697qp.pdf



Seems to mostly apply to material that was manufactured and/or copyrighted 
overseas, but that could affect sales of foreign posters here.



It affects eBay because a large percentage of their business comes from resale 
of items manufactured overseas, and an unfavorable ruling would affect how the 
company does business.





On 10/8/12 8:55 AM, "filip de volder" <[email protected]> wrote:



i don't see what this has to do with ebay ,   any american based company (be it 
ebay or emovieposter etc etc ) would be affected by this on the same level 
should this be decided by law .

 

Filip De Volder and the 0 other members of runbuffy

 

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:54:10 -0500

From: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [MOPO] Right to re-sell imperiled??

To: [email protected]



I wouldn't think this could extend to movie posters, could it? Of course eBay 
has done stranger things before!



On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Captain Bijou <[email protected]> wrote:

Here's a story about a case (Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons) pending before the 
U.S. Supreme Court that may be of interest for MOPO-L members:

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/your-right-to-resell-your-own-stuff-is-in-peril-2012-10-04?pagenumber=1

Earl Blair

CAPTAIN BIJOU 

www.captainbijou.com <http://www.captainbijou.com> 

 


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
<http://www.filmfan.com> 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.










 

Jay Nemeth-Johannes 

8901 N Rexleigh Dr 

Bayside, WI 53217 

(970) 290-9797 (Cell) 

-- 







Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
                                          
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to