Title:Who owns Marilyn Monroe?

Author(s):Mark Sableman

Source:Gateway Journalism Review. 42.328 (Fall 2012): p44.

Document Type:Article

Full Text: COPYRIGHT 2012 SJR St. Louis
Journalism Review

http://gatewayjr.org/

Full Text: 

America's
favorite sex symbol now belongs to us all.

 

You can now place the name "Marilyn Monroe" on
your product or package. You can portray Monroe's
sultry smile on your posters and advertising. And you don't need permission.

 

Fifty years after her death, Monroe
is no longer under private ownership.

 

Monroe's life
story involved movies, headline marriages and divorces, lots of sex appeal and
a tragic death. The story of the rights to her name and likeness is more
prosaic--it involves a legal principle known as the "right of
publicity" and the impact of long ago maneuverings in the Surrogate's
Court of New York.

 

 

The "right of publicity" is the right of a person
(usually a celebrity) to control use of his or her name, likeness and other
personal attributes in commercial advertising. Most states recognize this
right. Some states recognize it after the celebrity's death; some don't. 
California,
the home of many actors, does.

 

Monroe died in California,
and her popularity only increased after her death. Eventually, her heirs linked
up with professionals in managing publicity rights--and, for years since, 
Monroe's
right of publicity has been carefully managed for profit. Anyone who wanted to
use her name or image, or any iconic attribute closely identified with her, had
to buy a license from her publicity agent, which most recently has been CMG
Worldwide.

 

Her heirs made millions from publicity licensing of Monroe
commemorative plates, Monroe-branded jewelry or clothing, and countless other
products--including, for example, "Marilyn Merlot" wine.

 

But in 2005 Marilvn Monroe LLC, the entity, that licensed
her rights, sued Milton Green Archives, which then questioned whether Monroe's
rights survived her death, in August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit issued a decision with a simple and startling conclusion: Monroe's
right of publicity expired when she died.

 

Monroe, the
court concluded, was a domiciliary of the state of New
  York when she died, even though she died in California.
"'Domicile" is a complex legal concept, essentially referring to a
person's place of permanent residence which, in turn, depends on the person's
intent as much (or more) than his or her geographic location.

 

The executor of Monroe's
estate and her heirs had urged the New York Surrogate's Court, where her estate
was probated, to conclude that she was a domiciliary of the state of New
  York. They pressed that position hard--to avoid California
inheritance taxes--and the court agreed.

 

One problem: New York
law, unlike California lay, does
not permit a celebrity's right of publicity to survive death. (California's
position wasn't so clear when Monroe died in 1962, but it is now.)

 

So the Ninth Circuit's ruling is easy to explain. Monroe's
estate is bound ("estopped") by the position it took after her death.
She has been conclusively found to have been domiciled in the state of New
  York. Thus, her right of publicity derived from New
  York law--and, under New York
law, that right did not survive her death.

 

So break out the bottle of Marilyn Merlot, right? Now you
should be able to set up your own Monroe-based business, offering Monroe
posters, photos, jewelry, memorabilia, wine and Swiss cheese! Right?

 

Well, not quite. True, her right of publicity has been
judicially proclaimed dead. But other rights could be lurking in the
background: trademarks for existing products, and copyrights for photos,
posters, and movie stills, for example. Monroe's
heirs will do all they can to rely on such ancillary claims to extend their
valuable franchise.

 

Monroe's life
presented a classic Hollywood story of drama and sex
appeal. Monroe's estate tells a
different story, also classic in its own way; one of attempts to exploit
intellectual property rights so ephemeral and intangible that millions off
dollars can rest on the outcome of a single lawsuit.

 

Sableman, Mark

 

Source Citation   (MLA
7th Edition)

Sableman, Mark. "Who owns Marilyn Monroe?" Gateway
Journalism Review 42.328 (2012): 44. General OneFile. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.

Document URL

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA307670340&v=2.1&u=cvpl_lib&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=w

 

Gale Document Number: GALE|A307670340

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to