The problem is twofold: after the consortium of dealers (Coalition of
the Selling) have killed themselves off, the last one standing still has
to compete with 500,000 Mexican Lobby Cards...
regards,
*David Rew
[mob] 0402 925 158*
bidll.com
for serious collectors
<https://www.facebook.com/bidll> Follow us <https://twitter.com/bidll>
Follow us <http://www.pinterest.com/bidll/bidll-for-the-collector/>
<http://www.bidll.com>
Adrian Cowdry wrote on 20/11/2014 9:43 AM:
I disagree Rich
If a consortium were to pool resources and then sell through an
auction house or via a website - pool the profits and divide by those
involved.
The problem would be if Joe Schmo wants X for himself and Charlie
Farnsbarn wants Y for himself it comes down then to valuing the items
that would be for personal collections
/This Never Happened to the Other Fella..../
Adrian Cowdry
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art <[email protected]>
To: MoPo-L <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:03
Subject: Re: [MOPO] [FA] World's Largest Collection
the likelihood we dealers could split this up in any fashion and not
kill each other in the process is about zero
At 01:41 PM 11/19/2014, Richard C Evans wrote:
>I don't know Rich.
>
>They're your bunch of dealers, I'm just suggesting how they could
>equitably split it up!
>
>
>On 19 Nov 2014, at 21:34, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:
>
> > while I am sure there could be a profit motive, let me ask what
> dealers do you think could afford such a lot Richard?
> >
> > Maybe Heritage could buy the collection and feed it through their
> auctions for years to come, but beyond that, I don't think any
> dealer with $6m in the bank would be interested as they would
> already be near retiring with what they have.
> > the economics of selling & trying to get back 6m would be at the
> very least - a daunting task
> > Heritage does 8m or so annually and to my mind would be the
> singular sales possibility, but only if they can expect to double
> or triple their money by the slow sales of 3-4 years time (I'm sure they
could)
> >
> > I can't see any dealer involvement beyond that, unless someone
> acts as an agent/bidder at the auction to shield the identity of the real
buyer
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> > At 01:22 PM 11/19/2014, Richard C Evans wrote:
> >> Consigning to auction/s would be a solution for a group wouldn't it?
> >>
> >> Though admittedly, this just being idle speculation, haven't
> looked at maths, whether likely profit outweighs risk or what time
> frame market could bear.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19 Nov 2014, at 20:43, Richard Halegua Posters + Comic Art wrote:
> >>
> >> > At 11:47 AM 11/19/2014, Richard C Evans wrote:
> >> >> Would be interested to know what the view is on whether, if
> this sells, it's likely to stay complete or be broken up.
> >> >
> >> > I can't imagine anyone buying this collection to break it up
> >> > the starting bid is $6mil and the most likely buyers would be
> institutional collections.
> >> >
> >> > the BFI or the Academy being the 2 most obvious interested partys
> >> >
> >> > someone asked me if a bunch of dealers would group together &
> buy it, but here's the question to that "how would you expect a
> bunch of dealers to actually split it up?"
> >> > the fights that would be engendered would be epic.
> >> >
> >> > The collection has at least one lobby card from every Lon
> Chaney movie and every Boris Karloff movie. how would such portions be
divided?
> >> >
> >> > the collection will sell to one buyer, who will use it for exhibits
> >> >
> >> > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site atwww.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com>
> >> > ___________________________________________________________________
> >> > How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> >> > Send a message
> addressed to:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> >> > The author of this
> message is solely responsible for its content.
> >>
> >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site atwww.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com>
> >> ___________________________________________________________________
> >> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> >>
> >> Send a message addressed to:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> >>
> >> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
> >
> > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site atwww.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com>
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
> > Send a message addressed
> to:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
> > The author of this message
> is solely responsible for its content.
>
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site atwww.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
>
> Send a message addressed to:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
>
> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site atwww.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com>
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
