Great advice Kirby. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Kirby McDaniel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think that while the movie may indeed be funny, one has to question the 
> wisdom of making it at all.  Of course, there was the promise of $$$ involved 
> for Sony, so there you go.
> 
> I think Sony and exhibitors like Regal etc were afraid that the movie would 
> kill attendance at the multiplexes showing it, hurting the business in 
> general.
> 
> And the notion that something might happen at a screening - something bad - 
> is real enough.
> 
> But where were their HEADS when they decided to make a film which makes light 
> of the assassination of a head of state?  And don’t forget Li’l Kim is a God 
> also!
> 
> Where do they get off killing God?  Hmm?
> 
> You know they could have made X-MEN MEET THE HULK just as well.
> 
> The irony is that THE INTERVIEW is a lot hotter property dead than alive.
> 
> I suggest that you all just watch MIRACLE ON 34TH STREET again, and forget 
> the whole thing.
> 
> Kirby
> 
>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Posteropolis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, Toochis:
>>  
>> Death of a President (2006), about the assassination of George W. Bush was 
>> controversial, though not as much as this and it had only limited release 
>> anyway because it was not a major studio film.
>>  
>> One thing that never gets mentioned in this controversy is that Sony is a 
>> Japanese company and thus much more sensitive to pressure to North Korea 
>> than a US corporation might be, given the dark history that connects Japan 
>> and Korea and of course Japan’s physical proximity to North Korea.
>>  
>> Dave
>>  
>>  
>> From: MoPo List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Toochis 
>> Morin
>> Sent: December-19-14 9:20 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [MOPO] The Interview
>>  
>> I think the 9/11-type threats made it tough for the release. Also the other 
>> studios were upset that audiences would be too afraid to go to the movies. 
>>  
>> One question:  which movies have the assassination or killing of a 
>> contemporary living person in them?  What kind of controversy did they cause?
>>  
>>  
>> Toochis 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:11 AM, Simon Oram <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Sony have no backbone but that's typical of many if not all Corporations.
>>>  
>>>  I would of imagined Team America was more controversial?
>>>  
>>> Nomis
>>>  
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>>> From: Tommy Barr
>>> Sent: Friday, 19 December 2014 10:38
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Reply To: Tommy Barr
>>> Subject: [MOPO] The Interview
>>>  
>>> All very quiet here about what I thought would be an item of extreme 
>>> interest. Who is to blame for pulling the film - Sony or the American 
>>> cinema chains who refused to show the movie?
>>>  
>>> Tommy
>>>  
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
>>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1
>> 
> 
> Kirby McDaniel
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the MoPo-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.american.edu/scripts/wa-american.exe?SUBED1=MoPo-L&A=1

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to