Sorry SA, took it to be quasi rhetorical, and didn't realise an answer was anticipated. Its hard to respond directly to the re-statement, though as when I re-read the posts, to me what I wrote is clear and the re-statement is less clear, certainly the statements are similar but your summary introduces ambiguity that I was trying to exclude.
In my view "a static pattern of DQ" is SQ, there are no other categories. By that hypothetical persons' "clarification" they have simply named a piece of the intellectual static landscape. That said, I'm increasingly convinced that "source" or "essence" are better terms than DQ as, they attribute no particular assumptions to "it" whatever it is. Then in choosing to say "patterned source" in place of SQ, the language becomes absolutely clear and absolutely ugly. To re-state your re-statement: "Intellect-type-patterned-source offers further new intellect-type-derivative-order-patterned-source as analogy for that source, aknowledging in doing so that it is what it is. Is this helpfull? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Heather > Perella > Sent: 25 July 2007 19:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [MD] Aristotle & DQ > > > Jos, a still unanswered question to you below to help > me clarify what you said. > > > > [Marsha] > > > Yes, of course. Good point. I get that, it would > > > be the same with moi. > > > > You mean mu, correct? > > Ok, your a pebble. The context changes. > > > > [Jos] > > > >My point is that as soon as you get to "the > > essential source jos was > > > >referring to was:....." the next word that you > > enter will be wrong. > > > Sure, whatever one says dq is: would be wrong or > right. > Now, if somebody says what dq is, but clarifies that > it is a static pattern of dq, then one would be more > correct. Is this what your (Jos) driving at here? > > > > goin' for a walk, > Now back from the walk, > SA > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > ______________________Ready for the edge of your seat? > Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the > Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service supplied by > Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM > Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.) In case of problems, please > call your organisations IT Helpdesk. > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, > monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. > > > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the > attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, > disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are > not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and > inform the sender by return e-mail. > > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the > attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, > disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are > not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and > inform the sender by return e-mail. > > This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may > be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of > Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, > and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a > responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing > or forwarding e-mails and their contents. > This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet Anti-Virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
