At 12:34 PM 10/10/2007, Ham wrote:
>Preposterous? Incredible? Fantastic? Maybe. That's for my readers to
>decide. My own view is that it is no more fantasy than the MoQ, which by
>rejecting a metaphysical source has neither a logical foundation nor an
>implied purpose to support it.
Greetings Ham,
I do not believe RMP rejects a source. Read:
While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
(Pirsig, LILA, Chapter 32)
It's that he leaves QUALITY/Dynamic Quality indivisible, undefinable
and unknowable. That is not a rejection.
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
