The meaning of pragmatism as a tradition of philosophical thinking has been 
contested by those on the outside, and also intermurally by those within it.

I think the time has come for both sides, critics and purveyors, to move beyond 
the idea that "pragmatism" means "practicality."  There are many linguistic 
landmines having to do with common usage, common sense, original usage, 
philosophical usage, etc.  The classical pragmatists, Peirce, James, Dewey, 
amongst others (Schiller, Mead, etc.), surely had their reasons for using 
various rhetorical framings.  But the core of pragmatism as it has been worked 
out through the years has nothing (and everything) to do with "practicality."

The parenthetical is there to remind people that the classical rhetoric isn't 
completely worn out.  The insight they had was that things only became true or 
false in practice.

Pragmatism is the thesis that theory, thinking, metaphysics, philosophy, 
academics, poetry, math, education, school, business, baseball, 
_everything_--everything is useful if it has a use.  Tautological, yes, but 
notice the shift in focus: truth is what works, but _what is it working 
--for--_?  _What_ is its use?

Everything is relative to a purpose.  Theory and philosophy have uses.  They 
are true, they are worth keeping, if we can figure out to what purpose that 
they are useful for.  Pragmatism is antithetical to Kant and Plato and 
essentialism because they deny, not the thing-in-itself, but the 
_thing-for-itself_.  As Pirsig taught us, everything _is_ value and value is 
always relative to something _valuing it_.  (Pirsig's redescription of 
causation: B _values_ precondition A.)

Pragmatism doesn't destroy philosophy, nor does it let the Nazi's win.  
Pragmatism is the core of Socrates' message, it cuts out the bullcrap created 
over the last 2500 years and gets back to the reason Socrates started up his 
cross-examinations in the first place: know thyself; the unexamined life is not 
worth living.  At the core of pragmatism is the call to examine the purposes to 
which we perform various activities.  Know why you are doing them.  If it 
serves no purpose, cut it out.  If it does, could anything serve it better?  Is 
the purpose it serves a good one?  Might there be better purposes?

Pragmatism is a return to philosophy as it should be done.  Pragmatism returns 
us to the practice of life, to the experience of life.  There are many purposes 
that aren't "practical," not at least to the common usage of the term.  But 
pragmatism isn't about being practical, it is about knowing why we do things.  
It is about asking, "Okay, it works.  But for whom?"

Matt
_________________________________________________________________
Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser!
http://biggestloser.msn.com/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to