>> Well, I didn't tell you to embrace Communism. I told you to analyze it
>> objectively. I have in the past somewhat humorously called myself
>> "academically socialist with elitistic tendencies " . a Communist society
>> is not realistic in today's world I think, and maybe it never will, so
>> for
>> now I think the best thing is to balance up society - a concept lost to
>> America it seems. Lagom is a word everybody should learn.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagom
>
> The concept appears to be straight from Aristotle's ethics emphasizing
> moderation.
It is not.
As for "balance up society," Abe Lincoln said it best, "Government
> cannot endure permanently half slave, half free..."
Parlamentarism has worked quite well for us for quite som time. If you wish
to have a 18th century system that's allright I guess.
May I suggest you check
> out "Dictatorship of the proletariat."
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat
>
> Regards,
> Platt
You need not educate me on matters of Marxism and Communism. This too can be
argued for quite reasonable, but this discussion is quite futile so this
will be my last post in this tread.
Regards Chris
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
