[Magnus] >> As I said in my previous post, at least Chris is making a much larger >> change to the MoQ since he need to extend the biological level to >> encompass much of what we mean by intellect. If you don't agree it >> would be very interesting to see you two resolve that one.
[Bo] > I'm reeling after all these years and do not follow messages not > directly for me so where Chris .. extends biology into intellect ?? > but spell it out to me and I'll try. Yes, I'm not sure what Magnus really means, but I would tend to agree with this that Bodvar wrote: >I am saying that biology evolved the neural capacity to - you >know - but at that level there is no "manipulation of symbols" >(MOS) any more than we know that a dream is a dream when >dreaming. This capacity was adopted by the social level and with >language added the symbols that at the bio. were images (I >guess) became words (silent) but still not recognized as "abstract >thoughts in a mind", this knowledge is entirely intellect's. Get the >point? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
