Quoting Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > Can you cite a form of knowledge not based on an assumption? > > [Arlo] > When you said, "Every form of knowledge rests on assumptions", is > that bit of knowledge based on an assumption as well? If it too is > based on an assumption, then it might not always be true, no? > > This is just a restatement of "all this is just an analogy, including > this sentence." It is the paradox you jump on quick with others, but > seem not to see it here. > > The statement "every form of knowledge rests on assumptions" must > itself rest on certain assumptions. To be precise, you should say, > "according to my assumptions, every form of knowledge rests on assumptions". > > That would be correct.
Is that your answer to my question? When is a form of knowledge based on an assumption not always true? ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
