Hi Magnus and all, IMO DQ is only "agent" by analogy, only an acknowledgement of "undefined awareness".
Joe On 4/20/08 11:29 AM, "Magnus Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Christoffer Ivarsson wrote: >> I will agree to the MOQ being the Quality understanding of things. The MOQ >> is a new starting point, from which all things is categorized. The MOQ >> cannot be an intellectual pattern, because A can't produce A. > > No static pattern can produce anything really new by itself. DQ is > always required. On the other hand DQ can create anything. It's not SOM > that has created the MoQ, which will then create MoQ2, and then MoQ3, > etc. DQ has created all of them. > > So, as SA said, we don't need any meta-level. Just DQ. > > Magnus > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
