[Bodvar]
The social-intellectual relationship has been equally difficult in
intellectual- and social-steeped cultures (because no level knows
the Q context) and Pirsig (correctly) believes that the MOQ will
alleviate it. However I disagree with his idea that intellect can be
enlightened to see that its "devaluation" of social patterns creates a
social nightmare. Intellect is static and must by definition pursue its
mission. It's the MOQ that gives us the grand view and it is no
intellectual sub-set. Intellect is MOQ's sub-set!!.
[Chris]
I think this is a very important point Bo, but may I ask you to point out a
static intellectual value pattern please, and can you tell me why that
example is not a social pattern (where is the fundamental conflict?) and
then we can take it from there?
Mudding through
Chris
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
