DMB said to Mati (Chris, note)
"But if we equate intellect with SOM, then we have locked out any
other [intellectual] possibility."
Ian:
That is a simple statement of my point. I agree. Always been my main
(only ?) objection to Bo's SOL. Atrophied in history. I've described
my alternatives elsewhere ...

Ron:
Ian, DMB, This and the relegation of DQ/SQ description back to S/O
distinction utilizing subject/object logic as quality intellect.
Clearly Pirsig is not offering a subjective perspective, he is
offering an entirely different way of describing experience.
SOL places us right back in the same old SOM mess by replacing
SOM :TITs with MoQ TITs when MoQ doesn't recognize TITs at all.
(things in themselves) we are all tits-less in the eyes of MoQ.
and BALS-less too (being as logical support).

TITS rooted in BALS produces a jism of "isms" 



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to