> Ham: Whatever your labels, everything experienced in our created> existence
> is in constant flux and motion -- and, patterned or not, that> means
> DYNAMIC.> Chris replies:> The Static Patterns move according to cause and
> effect. Dynamic Quality> doesn't need to move. It is everywhere, all the
> time, and it only "hits" us> when we in our constant movement happen to get
> another glimpse of it.
> [Krimel]> It is sad when even Ham has a better grasp of the MoQ than one of
> its> alleged proponents. Chris, you might want to start by reading Lila. Its
> full> of problems but you gotta get a grip on the basics.
I'm not here to recite a Holy Book. This is my take on the MOQ, and this is a
far better way to view the relationship between DQ and SQ in my book.
It always bothered me when it was implied thet DQ swoops in and "hits" the
static patterns, because then DQ becomes God, more or less, and we are back in
the 1600ds dooing philosophy.
_________________________________________________________________
Senaste sportnyheterna & rykande färska resultat!
http://sport.msn.se/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
