Marsha, Not sure I agree with your phenomenal / conceptual split, but I would say all ontology is conceptual anyway. Ian
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:26 AM, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Question: > > Would you say that the ontological identity of patterns(all spovs) is > conceptual? That would be regardless whether they were related to > phenomenon (inorganic & biological) or purely conceptual (social & > intellectual). > > I'm just trying to think this through, and I'd love to know what you think. > > > Marsha > > > > > > . > . > > Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars......... > . > . > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
