Hi Marsha --
The MOQ starts with experience. Experience is reality.
If you're going to stick with this terminology, you will have to define what you mean by "experience".
I would define it as the awareness of being. Experience by itself is a malapropism. We cannot experience nothing, All experience is awareness of something. By my previous analysis, that "some-thing" is being Therefore, experiential reality (existence) is being-aware, and we are the beings aware.
The purpose of my analysis is to reduce assertions to fundamental propositions. I agree that physical existence is experiential, but unless we all agree as to what experience is, it's just another ambiguous word that could mean "imagining", "feeling", "sensibility", or "general knowledge". Indefiniteness spawns confusion.
Can you accept "being-aware" as my definition for experiential reality, at least for purposes of this discussion? If not, tell me why.
Thanks Marsha, Ham Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
