Andre,
You'll find this forum will argue what belongs in an moq discussion and
what does not. Some people will say they speak the true moq. The way I see
this, if you have something to say and come to this forum to say it - then
good, say it. Yet, admittedly, I'm one to also think that simple day to day
routines are definitely apart of the moq, so, even when I'm cleaning up around
the house something at quality is at work. I don't think a philosophy on
reality can leave out anything. Unless somehow the financial crisis is somehow
not part of reality and in some kind of yet undescribed vortex sphere outside
of reality - but I doubt that.
woods,
SA
--- On Mon, 9/29/08, Andre Broersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andre Broersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Subject: Re: A Rally Speech
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Monday, September 29, 2008, 11:08 PM
> Point taken Bodvar, and thank you for responding to my
> entry. So the way I
> understand it: there is difference of opinion of what
> comprises the levels
> ie inorg, org, soc and intel PoV's. That is: what
> belongs where, what is
> understood by that, where are the boundaries, where do they
> overlap etc etc?
> So now I'm going to be a real pain in the arse and
> ask...(in the hope it
> will not reel you more): where excactly are the differences
> of opinion? I
> thought Pirsig was reasonably clear on those
> I have learned from NLP that people can be working on the
> same issues year
> after year and when you get them together and ask them to
> define the
> issues... they are often in complete disagreement/ complete
> mis-understanding with eachother each having their own
> interpretations (note
> that this does not necessarily upset the baking of the
> cake).
> So my 2nd question is: is there agreement on the
> disagreements?!!
> Ahh I must have had about 2000 students asking me whether I
> liked China , if
> I can use chopsticks and if I like Chinese food.
> Please bear with me Discuss, I do have ideas and like to
> contribute even if
> they miss the point sometimes and am reluctant to go over 6
> years of entries
> to find out where everyone is ( I have had quality moments
> after huge
> missers myself) a point Pirsig makes in one of his
> annotations in LC.
> Sometimes an absolutely stupid remark can trigger an
> insight and of course
> sometimes even the taste of a madeleine or a particular
> step on the pavement
> (I am hinting at Marcel Proust of course) can trigger
> wonderful trains of
> thought.
>
> Nil Desperandum Illigitimus Carburundum
>
> Andre
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
