I agree with that view Woods. It was a sad day when the UK used that legislation for that purpose.
It's one of those cases of pragmatism where you feel ... I hope they know what they're doing ... (ie that they weren't doing it blindly). Without something like the MoQ as a moral framework, even the most intellectual, well intentioned govenment is flying blind, by the seat of their pants. Must listen to blind pilots ... refresh my memory. Ian On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Woods Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's an example of a blind giant. Legislation was intended to > fight terrorism, but the giant goes and places an intellectual pattern > into the social level and the giant blindly bounces this around in > ways the intellect wasn't intending. A good example, I think, of what > Andre was talking about: > > > > http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20081023/tuk-terrorism-laws-can-be-abused-to-stif-a7ad41d.html > > > > > woods > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
