Hi Ham,
Craig --
This message appears to have been posted following you response to my
most recent one, although it is a response to my earlier post of 12/4
in which I said:
"Only a sensible agent can realize Value, and neither subject nor
object
could exist in the absence of a non-relational source."
Craig:
This is where we differ Ham, the MoQ suggests that Value
realises the 'agent' and it is after that point that subjects and
objects are deduced to 'exist'.
Ham:
I don't understand what you mean by "Value realizes the agent". Since
an agent is an active, responsible cause (in this case, of actualizing
being from Value), it seems that you've stated the subject and
predicate in reverse. Are you suggesting that value is a cognitive
entity with the sensibility to realize and the intellect to "deduce"?
Steve:
"Value realizes the agent" does not mean that value becomes aware of
the agent. I assume what Craig means by "realizes" is that value makes
the agent real. The agent is manifested by value. In other words, what
we think of as the immutable self may be better thought of as a pattern
of preferences. You are what you like.
Best,
Steve
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
