Hi Platt A few days ago you agreed with my comment about science as a new "myth", I replied but it looks as if my post didn't make it into cyberspace. And for some reason I can't find my copy, nor your post, but I'll try to recount it.
What I replied was that I did not not quite like what I had invited to. Science as a new myth is what the New Age people use to debunk it. What I had meant was that all static levels are incomplete for the very reason of being static, i.e; just one half of the complete DQ/SQ reality and will start showing paradoxes if examined closely, intellect's science no different. So at first your agreement looked too enthusiastic (what a strange complaint ;-) but the more I studied it the more it looked as you had understood it just the way it was meant. Perhaps you (like me) alternate between regarding intellect and science as the block to understanding the MOQ and the next moment defending it vehemently as the highest static good ... which it notoriously is. IMO Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
