Possible to expand this a little further:
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._V._O._Quine
Quine's Epistemology
Just as he challenged the dominant analytic-synthetic distinction,
Quine also took aim at traditional normative epistemology. According
to Quine, normative epistemology is the trend that assigns ought
claims to conditions of knowledge. This approach, he argued, has
failed to give us any real understanding of the necessary and
sufficient conditions for knowledge. Quine recommended that, as an
alternative, we look to natural sciences like psychology for a full
explanation of knowledge. Thus, we must totally replace our entire
epistemological paradigm. Quine's proposal is extremely controversial
among contemporary philosphers and has several important critics,
with Jaegwon Kim the most prominent among them.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaegwon_Kim
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
