> [Marsha]
> The idea of the free market is a myth, a cruel joke.
> 
> [Arlo]
> I've said it before, and I'll say it again, a "market" is only as 
> good as the values of the society (or better said, it is a reflection 
> of social values). The much-lauded "free market" had no trouble in 
> the buying and selling of slaves throughout history, and a "free 
> market" has no qualms engaging in child or sex-slave trafficking. It 
> will distribute pornography with the same ease as it distributes my 
> weekly Time. It will unload a boatload of shackled "darkies" to slave 
> in plantations with the same ease as it unloads crates of 
> Playstations. A "free market" would traffic cocaine and meth with the 
> same mechanistic precision at it distributes Coca-Cola and Doritoes.
> 
> No one, not even Platt, truly wants a wholly unregulated market 
> (bye-bye copyright and hello personal nuclear missile sales!) The 
> issue is realistically about what regulations and why? To what degree 
> and what for? That is the sensible dialogue. Chest-thumping about the 
> "free market" is merely talk-radio rhetoric.

"A free market is a Dynamic institution. What people buy and what people 
sell, in other words what people value, can never be contained by any 
intellectual formula. What makes the marketplace work is Dynamic Quality. 
The market is always changing and the direction of that change can never be 
predetermined. The Metaphysics of Quality says the free market makes 
everybody richer-by preventing static economic patterns from setting in and 
stagnating economic growth. That is the reason the major capitalist 
economies of the world have done so much better since World War II than the 
major socialist economies. It is not that Victorian social economic 
patterns are more moral than socialist intellectual economic patterns. 
Quite the opposite. They are less moral as static patterns go. What makes 
the free-enterprise system superior is that the socialists, reasoning 
intelligently and objectively, have inadvertently closed the door to 
Dynamic Quality in the buying and selling of things. They closed it because 
the metaphysical structure of their objectivity never told them Dynamic 
Quality exists."  -- Robert Pirsig
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to