Actually Bo is not correct .... I was just counting up all the references to MoQ and the patterns / levels in the threads initiated by Nick in the past week. Dozens of them - just not in the mail headers ;-)
But I have already expressed my agreement with you to Nick - the onus is on him to make the connections. Ian On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:21 PM, MarshaV<[email protected]> wrote: > > Nick, > > Bo is correct, the track is Quality and the MOQ, so how is this relevant? > It may be, but at the moment the connection is not obvious to me. > > > Marsha > > > > > At 08:17 AM 6/9/2009, you wrote: >> >> Ian: >> > Lilburne's first post was only 3 days ago. What makes you recommend it ? >> >> Nick: >> The quality of his post. He introduced it in another forum. He seems to >> be >> brilliant on the topic. >> He's been studying this for awhile and therefore isn't blogging on a whim >> on >> these topics. He's put a lot of reading and effort into what he knows for >> a >> long time now from what I gather discussing with him. So he's blogging >> this >> information after a great length of study. >> >> Here's a quote of Lilburne's perspective and his explanation of what he >> plans on >> doing first the other "person's post" and then Lilburne's response: >> >> Person's Post: >> >> "that's interesting, how did both David Hume and Aritotle influence you? >> I would think they would both be jarring to the mind if they were both >> believed mainly because hume was such a radical a posteriorist as opposed >> to aristotle's apriorism." >> >> Lilburne response: >> >> "I'm going to go into that in detail when my history of epistemology >> series >> of posts reaches Aristotle and Hume. But, basically I'm influenced by >> Hume's >> philosophy of mind and Aristotle's basic teleological analysis of human >> nature, >> his taxonomy of concepts, and the application of his formal logic to >> economics. >> I'll try to square that circle in my blog. Also, I believe Aristotle is >> not nearly as >> a prioristic as he is often characterized, and that Hume's a posteriorism >> is not >> as crude as many think. Aristotle was no Cartesian rationalist, and Hume >> was no Schmollerite/positivist." >> >> I would definitely read all his posts from the beginning. They are each >> very, very >> short considering the topic, but he is concise and thorough enough that a >> clear >> understanding can be surmise in my opinion. >> >> >> >> Nick >> >> >> >> -- >> Be Yourself @ mail.com! >> Choose From 200+ Email Addresses >> Get a Free Account at www.mail.com >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > _____________ > > "He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has." > (Friedrich von Schiller) > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
