Bodvar to Ian: I agree with using language's long-ingrained "intellectual" terms that include mind and matter in normal discourse, but right now we are up in the high country of metaphysics and yours about "future possibilities of intellect" does not sound of MOQ understanding to me.
Andre: Hi Bodvar, Ian. Bodvar, can you please tell me what you mean by the last part of your sentence...i.e. 'does not sound of MOQ understanding...'. What, for you, are the indicators that lead you to conclude that someone 'understands' the MoQ? (this, apart from the notion that intellect is the S/O aggregate). Secondly, you seem to imply that 'static' means unchangeable/fixed. Is this your understanding of the term static? In anticipation, Thank you Andre the dud. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
