Actually, I like better: non-wave and opposite-from-non-wave. Yes, that is better...
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MarshaV Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 3:06 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Painting Okay, here's my puzzlement. Instead of wave or particle, it should be wave or not-wave, or particle or not-particle. If you set up to measure its properties as a wave, you not only exclude knowing its properties as a particle, you exclude knowing all other possible properties. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MarshaV Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [MD] Painting Oh, oh. I'm seeing everything as particles and waves... The more precise a definition the less you can know about the experience it represents. And the answer is yes, no and all of the above. Or true, false and all of the above. Or particle, wave and all of the above. Or mythos, logos and all of the above. Or there is no answer, there never was an answer, there never will be an answer. _____________ "There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them." (Werner Karl Heisenberg) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
