Hi all I think most of you are all right. Even if that is not relativism. I think it has Quality.
I appreciate your answers to my latest posting to this forum. But as I'm new here, but not about RMP, I think you can use a short presentation. I am living in Sweden, my gran pa was an american citizen and maybe that has to do with my orientation to the american way. I am employed by a company in New Jersey. So please dont call me.un-american. I have been dealing with this Quality matter since 30 years and I have worked out a definition on the whole concept Quality that I think should catch yuour attention. I have read Kant, not completely, not graduated, but enough to tell that I see him as a funny guy with a bright brain. I was just using him at the desk as a base point for my own expression. Writing this at 4 a m in bed on my old cellphone. I have also read Lila.of course as that was.one of the conditions for thls forum. If you have spent 10 years of MOQology here there could be time for something new. I can bring my "Little twig" growing out from ch 19 in ZMM and the last one in Lila. As I see it, it was the missing.definition of Q that broke down Phaedros. RMP has done a tremendus work on the philosophologic roadmap of the surrounding which seem to be well examined. If more than one in the audience admit I think it is time to pick up Phaedros knife again and start the dissecation. Yours sincerely Jan-Anders Andersson Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
