John:
Sorry Ham. I guess you'll have to set your sights a little lower if you want to avoid such disappointments in the future. One question though. Why are you here? I mean why are you and Platt not spending your time in the discussion and explication of the philosophy of Randian Objectivism? I'm sure there's a group of like-minded INDIVIDUALS out there where you can all go and affirm your own intellect to each other. Why anyone would be interested in such a circle-jerk is beyond my imagination, but I'm sure they are out there. Ron: A collection of individuals? Ham sez they do not exist. in fact engaging in this forum, for the ilk of platt and Ham is hypicriticle, they themselves are engaging in a collective social forum of the exchange of ideas. stinkin collectivist in individuals clothing if you ask me. > I'm also convinced more than ever that the nihilistic > tilt of this forum makes an MoQ breakthrough highly unlikely. > > Good luck in finding a philosophical approach better suited to your > intellect. > > --Ham > BTW, you do know what her followers called themselves, don't you? The Collective. You should join. The flexibility of the human brain to be ironic and hypocritical simultaneously would make a fascinating case study, if nothing else. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
