Hi John, An oral (living) third-part of the trilogy, with MoQ as the operating system, facilitating lifelong learning.
I like it. What is interesting (in your response to Platt) is that you still see "teachers" and you still see them having to "judge" students. I don't disagree, but I am having difficult discussions in another froum concerned with learning and using "wisdom" where there is tremendous prejudice against the idea that teachers may be (should be expected to be) wiser than students - that anything other than "facts" can be taught. People seem to pay lip service to the value of values, but seem unwilling to be judged by anyone else with values - as if, ... unless those values can be objectively defined there can only be arbitrary relative subjective values (that debate again) ... I tend to use the "living processes of governance" arguments - but your OS metaphor might be interesting to try. The MoQ by any other name ... too juicy to miss indeed. Regards Ian On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:04 PM, John Carl<[email protected]> wrote: > Platt, > Thanks for sharing your insights and suggestions, Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
