Another tirade incited by fear of truth. On 9 Sep 2009 at 16:24, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
> [Platt] > Squawk, squawk, squawk. The parrot never stops. > > [Arlo] > OK. I understand "thinking" is hard for you. I > get that. So let me try to explain it again. When > you repeat YOURSELF to ensure others who come to > the dialogue later are not misinformed, this is > not being a parrot. Many, many people repost > their words there, and I've never levelled a > charge of squawking against any of them. Who parrots his posts verbatim as you do? >YOU, on > the other hand, as it has been CLEARLY shown (and > I do repeat below) simple repeat the verbatim > squawk points that are rehashed ad nauseum in your little media world. > > Evidence. Anyone can simply turn on any of the > Prime Squawkers tonight, get out some beer, and > play "drink whenever I hear banal, cliche or > doesn't believe it himself" used to describe the > Obama speech. Its that easy. The evidence is > there. "Banal", "cliche" and "doesn't believe it > himself" are simply the rehashed squawk points > clearly used by the talk-radio buffoons, and > clearly re-squawked over and over by the "dittoheads" (apropos name, btw). I suggest you look up the word "evidence." > Here, though, you give a CLASSIC example of the > Great Pee Wee Maneuever. I've called you on this > many times before (anyone can check the > archives), and while it is a straightforward > tactic, your use of it here is TEXTBOOK. You are > no longer even trying to deny (you can't) the > "squawk trifecta" you posted earlier, but now, > having been called on it, shown to be a parrot, > you try to turn that around to make ME out to be > what I've clearly shown to be you. If the shoe fits. > Pee Wee Herman's classic line "I know what you > are but what am I?" sums up this sad rhetorical > ploy exactly. I'm a bit surprised you'd try to > pull it off here, I mean, its kinda obvious. But > I know you work with a limited number of rhetorical devices. By contrast we know you are all rhetoric and no substance. > [Platt] > And here he is a professor at a state college and > doesn't know how to spell "squawk." > > [Arlo] > Guilty as charged. You got me on this one. In my > defense, however, I'll only say that I am very, > very happy that "squawk" is not a word I am > forced to use in my daily activity very much at > all, so I have little practice spelling it, nor > little need to, until I find myself confronted with, well, people like you. > > But at least I can admit when I've been called correctly on something. Well, pin a rose on you. Along with your many other unattractive attributes, you're insufferable. > ============== > > In case anyone missed it, I'll include this > embarrassing evidence of squalking in all my replies on this thread. > > [Platt] > Easy to be distracted since Obozo's speech was > full of cliches and banalities, most of which he doesn't believe himself. > > [Arlo] > Squalk, "banal". Squalk, "cliche". Squalk, "doesn't believe himself". > > From yesterday's American Thinker response to the President's speech. > > "With his Back to School Event (text here), > President Obama becomes the nation's > Nanny-in-Chief, filling his speech with > banalities at every turn, a speech as forgettable > as any principal's remarks at the opening > assembly of the year. The triumph of the banal is > complete as clichés cascade from the eloquent Obama lips..." > > Our resident parrot fulfills his chosen roll once again. > > But lest anyone think "banal" and "cliche" are > recent squalking points of the talk-radio morons, > I invite you all to do a Google search for "banal > cliche obama speech". From The Weekly Standard to > The Washington Monthly, to countless re-squalks > on blogs and forums (where the good little > parrots squalk back the talking points they hear > on that day's Hush Bimbo program). > > Want more? From Hush's grammatically incorrect > response to the speech on his website yesterday. > "He just gave a speech that he doesn't believe a > word of." Want even more?*.... Let's play a > drinking game. If you can stomach the vitriol for > longer than a few minutes, turn on the Hannity > radio program for a while today, and drink every > time he squalks (or a caller resqualks) the words > "banal" and "cliche" and "doesn't believe it > himself". I guarantee you'll be drunk in less than an hour. > > All the correct squalks from our resident parrot. > How fucking embarrassing to hear it here. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
