Bodvar to Andre and Ron: Andre had said:: > ?I am beginning to wonder to what extent the intellectual level > dominates the play in patterning the undifferentiated? Just laterally > drifting.
Bodvar: Intellect is? the highest and best "patterner". However, if intellect is "patterning the undifferentiated" ? IMO it re-patterns all? lower levels' pattern in its own subject/object matrix. Andre: Perhaps I misunderstand this one Bodvar but if it patterns all lower levels in its own matrix isn't that the ultimate SOM configuration? The one we have supposedly emerged from with the MoQ? (Is this the point you are making??). I am asking this because I do not understand the remainder of the paragraph..i.e about being DQ junkies. You see, I thought there were five moral systems within the MoQ 'connecting' the four levels, each of which has very little to say to the other (they are 'discrete'), they have their own agenda, and do not understand eachother's 'language'. The inorganic level is patterned according to the laws of physics, the organic level is patterned according to the laws of nature etc etc. this seems to me to be a participatory process of DQ/SQ not intellect 'on its own' (otherwise you'd get into an idealist frame n'est pas?). Anyway, I'll try not to get too smart either which isn't difficult. Why do I find the MoQ so difficult? How is a six-year-old to make sense of any of this? Cheers, Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
