Hi Mary, All,

The absolute/relative question you raise is a version of the question
that sparked the whole thing: "is the Quality in the subject or the
object?" Is it subjective (relative) or objective (absolute)?

The answer Phaedrus saw was that it is neither. As Dewey said, reality
is an evaluative term. Value preceeds cutting up reality into subjects
and objects and is not the property of either one of these categories.
Instead Quality is what is being categorized as subjects and objects.
The answer is mu. So much for ontological or metaphysical
relativism/absolutism. Pirsig denies the context from which it makes
sense to ask "is it realtive or absolute?" in metaphysical terms.

But what about epistemological relativism/absolutism? Clearly
justification for evaluations is relative to the static patterns of
the person doing the justifying, but we also share many of the same
static patterns. So from an epistemological perspective, Quality is
both subjective and objective depending on what we are talking about.
For inorganic and biological patterns, we generally have fairly broad
agreement on criteria for making evaluations, so we can say that these
patterns are objective. We don't have such intersubjective agreement
about social and intellectual patterns, so we can say that these
patterns are subjective. On the other hand, mathematics is
intellectual but objective, and there is no public method available to
determine whether it is true or false that I have a headache which
then is a fairly subjective biological pattern, so I think Pirsig's
clean cut between objective and subjective levels doesn't always work.

Anyway, I thought considerring metaophysical versus epistemological
subjectivity might shed some light on our ongoing discussions about
realtivism and absolutism. What do you think.

Best,
Steve
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to