Hello John, The list of labels I might apply to myself is long, but for the moment I am happy to call myself a MoQ'er. Value, Quality, Experience, all unpatterned & patterned or Dynamic & static, seems as real as it gets, but I might also say that my experiences are both conventional and Empty. Why I choose to call myself a MoQ'er rather than a Buddhist is because I think the MoQ offers an excellent bridge between East and West in the four levels and their goodness.
I am a MoQ'er. Marsha On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:04 PM, John Carl wrote: > I agree Marsha with you when you say its all about the now. > > Does that mean you're an existentialist also? > > > Its not the thinking about the goodness, but the goodness of the thinking > that matters. > > John > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:47 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> John, >> >> Quality is goodness, it's the thinking about it that ruins it. >> >> >> While sustaining biological and social patterns >> Kill all intellectual patterns. >> Kill them completely >> And then follow Dynamic Quality >> And morality will be served. >> (LILA, Chapter 32) >> >> >> For me, Quality/Goodness is everywhere in the now. Not the past, not the >> future, but now. >> >> >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
