Oh proponent of the metophisics of rAndoMness, or MOr, Or should I say, "hpownfkfm da'spfddocvm"
or whatever random thing pops into my mind. which is probably the way you see me anyway so what's the difference? nothing really matters, I hear ya. whyevenpayattentin to any qqulalaitya ata all..'dclkpe I mean, from my perspective, if randomness is the metaphysical center of existence and nothing really matters, there is no good. What a ridiculously non-good idea. Or put a nother way what a random idea. I'd tuck the mOr back into yer noggin krimel and try shakin' something gooder out. Perchance a new Avatarian perception is required. Yours as ever, J Carl > [Krimel] > I say it is better to embrace randomness and our responses to it, as > integral to epistemology and metaphysics. Evolution is entirely about how > static patterns emerge and persist in a random universe. Until the MoQ > wises > up on this score, the "big picture" it offers will remain a shadow of what > might have been if Pirsig hadn't chicken out on his Metaphysics of > Randomness. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
