Hi Andre ... nope, you got me there, no idea. (The response was to no one specifically, following responses from you and Marsha, not you specifically. Did you actually read the mail at the start of this thread ? Did you actually read my last mails in the finger painting thread ?) Anyway ...
So here again - Celebrity #2: A rhetorical celebrity like Pirsig understands that celebrity (a social pattern) might cloud his judgement in understanding things ... so he chose to avoid it. A scientific celebrity like Dawkins ... doesn't get it (and therefore might be allowing celebrity to cloud his judgement) Regards Ian On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian, probably to Andre: > (See the finger painting thread.) > > Andre: > Ming bei, duibuqi. Wo bu ting tade wenti. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
