>[Craig]
> Rather the reasoning should go: 
a) I is better than S 
b) :. to the
> extent that I dominates S within a system, that system is better. 

Then the
> discussion can focus on the extent that I does/doesn't dominate S 
within a
> particular system. 
(Of course, this still leaves us with the question I
> raised a while back: 

Is it better for  high quality social patterns to
> dominate  low quality 
intellectual patterns or vice versa ?) 

Ok. But even under this system if still have to somehow figure out whether a
pattern is intellectual or not and I see no way within the implied MoQ rules
it is any more than a guess. And even if you do you're still faced with your
final conundrum. Or communism in practice.

Dave


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to