Mark and John 13 Feb. Mark wrote to John
> No doubt about it that religion is static. It changes names when it > changes. I also find intellect to be caught in static patterns. A > good idea will catch hold and dominate for a while until a new idea > comes about. This is true in science. You and John make many strange statements, the result of the one- eyed leading the blind I guess ;-). The hitherto weirdest is ".. I also find intellect to be caught in static patterns". Intellect is a static level so no wonder. However it has undergone a metamorphosis, before it was SOM and one idea became so unstable that it "took off on a purpose of its own" to become the MOQ which in turn re-shaped SOM to become its own 4th static level. From then on "intellect" does not mean a mental realm where ideas reside, rather the value of the S/O distinction of which sinence is the best. But don't expect intellect or sience to get "religious ideas" if that is what you mean. > It seems to me that for intellect to jump to new ideas, there has to > be a dynamic interplay with the non-intellect. It is this submersion > for a while followed by rebirth that makes intellect dynamic. It is > quite possible, that what is occurring beneath the surface (so to > speak) is the driving force behind intellect. The resulting > intellectual description is a result of non-intellectual phenomenon. > It serves to place a stake in the ground, influence the thinking of > others, spread and mature. The non-intellectual driving force has long ago (least 50 years when RMP had his epiphany) created THE intellectual pattern so dynamic that it could not be contained by its parents and it "left home" but this group seems hell bent on hauling the "prodigy child" back into the fold. That is of course impossible but it will probably delay its "coming of age" for an infinite time. It can't be helped > Possibly intellect springs from Quality, it attaches itself, and > Quality sends out a new shoot to climb up the wall of knowledge. I > have no idea where my discoveries come from, all I know is that they > jumps from one idea to the next without much in between. I'm not sure what all this means, you seem as volatile as Andre the Flying Dutchman who had an Eureka moment every other week but each time fell lame to the ground. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
