So thanks to Magnus, I finally found me in the old archives where I discovered Dave Thomas was my first ever MD interaction.
It's like jumping into the wayback machine. Spooky and yet weirdly thrilling. Pardon me for jumping in so soon - I only joined this list today - but I feel like I've been bottled up for a long time - having read ZMM in 1981 and bursting to discuss it ever since. I was so eager to get my hands on Lila that I actaullly went and bought it hardcover. So forgive any newbie ignornaance as I leap into the fray. Cheers to all and glad to be here! On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, David L Thomas wrote: (snip) *> That being said and understanding that this site is dedicated to the * *> discussion of Pirsig's work; How does it futher the understanding of his work * *> to isolate his work from all other philosophy? Are we to claim that the MoQ * *> was created by "divine intervention" or that Pirsig's work appeared on a * *> "blank slate" with no influence from prior philosophies? We know from his * *> writing that many, if not most, of those ten-jillion slips were references to * *> other peoples work that he read extensively in preparation for writing. * *> * *> Platt, I believe you would agree that is reasonable to say that the MoQ is * *> moral or meta-ethical philosophy. So let's ask a moral question. * I don't know Platt and I certainly don't know any professional philosophers personally, but it seemed pretty obvious to *my* reading of the two books that MoQ is not a philosophy. How could it be? Note the name "Metaphysics of Quality" - as opposed to "Philosophy of Quality". Koan for the day: If it was possible to have a philosophy of quality, by what would we judge it? I would have thought that the whole centerpiece of MoQ is that value is primary. *> Is it ethical to write philosophy and publish it in the guise of novels? * Begging the assertion that MoQ is a philosophy - isn't Philosophy basically the invention of a character in a novel by Plato? Pirsig's work isn't determined by where the book clerk in Borders places it (yup, I've certainly found it in the Automotive Section) where it belongs is determined by what it says. Any words that question the basis of existence are usually termed "Philosophy". No matter how those words are transported, packaged or categorized. *> Here are the patterns of value we need to morally adjudicate. * *> * *> 1. The cards are stacked against him, * *> 2. He refused to "play the game" * *> 3. Wrote two books that were published, promoted, and can be read as "novels" * *> 4. He defends his work, in part, as original, serious, philosophy. * *> * *> But the kicker is this approach avoids the need to accredit any sources. After * *> all it's only FICTION! * *> * *> The criteria we would like it to meet is "If everybody did this would the * *> world be a better place." * *> * *> DLT * I can agree with your first three statement. I don't know what you mean by moral adjudication. Pardon me if I make a hasty judgement here, but your whole message seems imbued with a moral tone (disaproving of "novel" and FICTION!) carries a whiff of somebody upset about the overturning of the moral order. I think I can understand that. In fact, a great deal of Lila seems to be a resonse to this victorian antiphathy to MoQ. I believe since the author himself addressed this conflict extinsively, nobody would gain by my feeble reiteration, except I'll tap into my Libra need for balance and commiserate a bit... Pirsig is unfair. He actually didn't invent any interesting new philosophy which we can compare with our old philosophy. He offered us no advancement in Philosophy. Instead he introduced a dead end to philosophy - sort of tricky philosophical jiu-jitsu that overthrows all philosophical positions held. For whether or not any philosophy is "good" You can't judge "good" by anything else. So what the heck do you guys usually talk about anyway? jc Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
