Bo >Pirsig doesn't make such an elementary mistake. His point is that >because objects are not fundamental, there is more than one way to divide >things into objects.
But in ZaMM, before he made the decision to "go between the horns", he started with quality and then was asked the question whether is was subjective or objective. Before saying neither he could have just as well said both. >Can I read it? I need all the ammo I can get. You won't find anything useful there. It's on the MoQ website under the forum essays. Strawdog bites Strawman Dave > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing > etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: h > ttp://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/a > rchives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
