Seething? Not me Bo. A bit sad maybe that after all this time you've
failed to make the case for your SOL and continue to make the same basic
errors that have been pointed out to you over and over again.
But to re-iterate, just in case you've forgotten:
On 06/03/2010 18:50, [email protected] wrote:
Regrettably it's impossible to counter Strawson because the only
approach that would render his criticism irrelevant - namely the SOL
interpretation
So why is it that you've done nothing to provide Craig with the
ammunition to stop Strawson in his tracks?
According to you, the SOL will make his criticism irrelevant - to me it
is and always has been irrelevant, regardless of your input - and yet
you have failed to rise to the challenge. Just more hot air, bluster and
insults which are the trademarks of your position.
So why don't you demonstrate to all of us poor befuddled and mistaken
lesser mortals who support Pirsig's and not your, interpretation of the
MoQ, how to "...render his [Strawsons] criticism irrelevant..." so that
Craig can pose a counter-position to Strawsons own based on your SOL
meanderings?
Are you up to it or are you, as I previously stated, all mouth and no
substance?
For your clarification, my position regarding the MoQ is pretty much
identical to Pirsig's with a few disagreements here and there but
substantially the same. And that includes opposition to your, mistaken,
interpretation of his work. How you've failed to understand this is
anybody's guess!
Horse
PS
Re: Struan - I saw him as a threat to moq_discuss, not the MoQ. I liked
the guy and thought it was a shame when things got nasty and, as you
say, he was honest about his position. You, on the other hand, denigrate
Pirsig and anyone else who disagrees with you with insults and shallow
put-downs, whilst still failing spectacularly to make your case to just
about everyone else on this forum.
On 08/03/2010 08:59, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Horse
You wrote:
Then rather than being smug and flapping your gums Bo, why haven't
you posed the perfect question to Strawson in order to "...render
his criticisms irrelevant..." or are you all mouth and no substance
as per the SOL?
I see you are seething, but I have done nothing BUT honing out the
MOQ that Phaedrus intended and is impervious to Strawsonian kind of
criticism. Remember the time when Struan Hellier was the enemy, but
he posed no danger as he openly declared himself an outsider, while
you as an alleged insider yet wielding a false MOQ (I don't exactly
know your position, but anything non-SOL is false) pose a more grave
danger.
Your sincerely
Bodvar
Horse
On 06/03/2010 18:50, [email protected] wrote:
Regrettably it's impossible to counter Strawson because the only
approach that would render his criticism irrelevant - namely the
SOL interpretation
--
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but to
skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a
ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
------- End of forwarded message -------
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
--
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an
attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine
in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what
a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
