John said to dmb:
Are you starting to understand how Royce's Absolute is Direct Experience, or 
DQ, yet dave?


dmb replies:

The stuff you quoted from John McDermott seemed quite compelling and 
challenging to me and so you're more likely to convince me with more thought 
along those lines.

But here, you've only provided reasons NOT to equate Royce's Absolute with DQ. 
I think you were quoting Royce when you wrote, "this supposed universal knowing 
consciousness, this "not ourselves" has, under the conditions stated, all the 
essential characteristics of a real world.  It is beyond us; it is independent 
of us; its facts have a certain correspondence to our sensations."
Now compare this idea of a universal knowing consciousness that is beyond us 
and independent of us to the idea of direct everyday experience. This notion of 
a universal consciousness is what Pirsig is talking at the end of chapter 29, 
when he says that Quality "is not some intellectualized Hegelian Absolute. It 
is direct everyday experience." Those two things are very different and what 
you're offering here as equivalent to direct everyday experience is just such 
an Absolute. It doesn't have to be Hegel's version or come out of Hegel's mouth 
for it to be objectionable. We can see this in the description you've provided. 
Look at that Royce quote and ask yourself some questions. 
In what sense can direct experience be equated with a universal knowing 
consciousness? (The former is an empirical fact while the latter is a 
metaphysical entity created by logic but is not known in experience as such.) 
In what sense is direct everyday experience "not ourselves"? In what sense is 
direct experience independent of us or beyond us? Pirsig's Quality is called 
the primary empirical reality and the cutting edge of experience. I don't see 
how this kind of immediate experience can reasonably be characterized as 
transcendent or independent of us in any way. Pirsig is talking about the 
experience of actual people. Royce is talking about something "not ourselves". 
The incompatibility of these two ideas is obvious, don't you think? 



                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to